Received: from mail69.mimecast.co.za (41.74.193.69) by mail.uct.ac.za (137.158.154.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:50:32 +0200 Received: from mail07.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail07.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.23]) by mail69.mimecast.co.za; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:50:30 +0200 Received: (qmail 49508 messnum 10022644 invoked from network[213.94.190.12/avas01.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 8 Apr 2013 08:50:29 -0000 Received: from avas01.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (213.94.190.12) by mail07.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 49508) with SMTP; 8 Apr 2013 08:50:29 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([86.40.18.41]) by avas01.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net with Cloudmark Gateway id MLnT1l0010tA4Pq01LnWmm; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:47:58 +0100 Message-ID: <51628406.6030508@eircom.net> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:47:02 +0100 From: Chris Addington User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 To: undisclosed-recipients:; Subject: UPDATE 3: New Academic Year pending -> urgency for & logistics of correcting school texts, progressing further R&D, codification of science principles/theories, processes for challenges thereto - Re: Reply to RIA Luke Drury + eircom destroying mails Re: UPDATE 2: Formal Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence that counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from Isaac Newton's Opticks & therefrom References: <51627F24.2080303@iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: <51627F24.2080303@iafrica.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <51627F24.2080303@iafrica.com> X-MC-Unique: 113040810503002201 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000805090009000309000109" Return-Path: cdadd4@eircom.net X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: SRVWINEXC004.wf.uct.ac.za X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous MIME-Version: 1.0 --------------000805090009000309000109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -------- Original Message -------- Subject: =09UPDATE 3: New Academic Year pending -> urgency for & logistics= =20 of correcting school texts, progressing further R&D, codification of=20 science principles/theories, processes for challenges thereto - Re:=20 Reply to RIA Luke Drury + eircom destroying mails Re: UPDATE 2: Formal=20 Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence that=20 counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from Isaac=20 Newton's Opticks & therefrom Date: =09Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:26:12 +0100 From: =09Chris Addington To: =09Luke Drury CC: =09privateoffice@taoiseach.gov.ie, taoiseach@taoiseach.gov.ie,=20 eamon.gilmore@tanaiste.gov.ie, "Chief Justice (Ireland) Susan Denham"=20 , webmaster@president.ie, Commissioner Garda=20 , Commissioner Garda Ops=20 , fergus.healy@garda.ie,=20 pressoffice@garda.ie, research@garda.ie, adrianhardiman@courts.ie,=20 aineoconnor@courts.ie, TomDaly@courts.ie, sfadmin@eircom.net,=20 richard.bruton@djei.ie, richard.bruton@oireachtas.ie,=20 finian.mcgrath@oireachtas.ie, Averil Power ,=20 Aodhan ORiordain *TO: * *Royal Irish Academy RIA, President, Luke Drury* *Royal Dublin Society RDS,* *Royal Institute RI,* *Royal Society RS,* *Royal Meteorological Society RMetS,* *Royal Observatory RO,* *Royal Marsden Hospital RMH,* *Royal Academy of Engineering RAE,* *Royal Astronomer:* *- Presidents/Chairpersons, Executives & Members* *CC: HM Queen Elizabeth II* *Privy Council - Lord President Nick Clegg & Privy Councillors* *BT* *CERN* *& as per addressees & general* *April 8, 2013* *Re: UPDATE 3: New Academic Year pending -> urgency for & logistics of=20 correcting school texts, progressing further R&D, codification of=20 science principles/theories, processes for challenges thereto -* *(Formal Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence=20 that counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from=20 Isaac Newton's Opticks & therefrom* *& retransmission of the founding 'Formal Application for meeting' on=20 March 19)* To RIA President, Luke Drury Dear Luke Drury Subsequent to the retransmission of the 'Formal Application for meeting'=20 - it is clear that much of Newton's Opticks is wrong & that other=20 science principles derived therefrom are also wrong. A new academic year is fast approaching (September) for European=20 schools, academies, universities - in other regions new academic year=20 starts next January - nevertheless there are pressing issues that need=20 attention to ensure that corrected school texts are in place for the=20 next academic year. There is not much time left for completion of these=20 pressing issues. There is still much science & associated engineering that needs to be=20 done simply to address the basics of the errors & to correctly define=20 the new science & to ensure correct engineering verification of same. In addition the administrative planning & logistics of replacing old=20 incorrect texts with new texts requires considerable efforts, and can=20 only be executed once the science/engineering & verification is complete. Once this process is underway I feel sure that it will quickly become=20 clear that science principles/theories need to be codified or formally=20 listed & indexed, and with administrative processes & procedures to=20 handle challenges to existing theories. Such an initiative would need to=20 be centralised. It would be beneficial for Ireland & RIA if the RIA were=20 to take on these global responsibilities, vis: for formal=20 codification/listing (similar to Darwinian taxonomy?) & for=20 administrative process of challenges. Government should also be approached for assistance in this regard; and,=20 later, for contributions from other nations; as both these are mammoth=20 tasks. I respectfully urge that a prompt meeting, as requested in my Formal=20 Application, is established to address both the physics=20 science/engineering & to plan the administrative logistics. I am=20 available at reasonably short notice now that school term has=20 recommenced & would appreciate from you suggested dates, times & venue=20 for a meeting and your views on a draft agenda for same. I point out that the issues for this meeting address only physics=20 science/engineering - we need also to begin addressing the numerous=20 gross errors pertaining to 'economic science' as economies throughout=20 the world are in severe distress due to incorrect national socio-economy=20 policies based upon those 'science' errors. There is urgent need to progress correct Economy Science & Economy=20 Engineering Sincerely Chris Addington Pr.Eng. cdadd2@gmail.com, cdadd3@eircom.net, +353 (0)86 168 4318 Chris Addington Pr.Eng. On 20/03/2013 09:39, Chris Addington wrote: > >> to ria - president, luke drury >> cc as per addressees & general >> from chris addington pr.eng. >> >> dear luke drury >> >> thankyousincerely4yourreply >> >> i understand the delay in your reply & hope all is now well re your=20 >> recent op. >> >> re: mails - the fact that you have not received an earlier mail from=20 >> me (with application for meeting re newton's opticks) indicates that=20 >> eircom (& upc.ie, & diamatrix.co.za, all being owned/controlled by=20 >> usa corporates) have purposefully destroyed my mails sent via their=20 >> server system. this is a clear criminal abuse of power by corporate=20 >> juristic persons in one sovereign state over persons in another=20 >> sovereign state; criminal interferences in sovereign affairs, an=20 >> issue that respective governments are obligated to stop; and which=20 >> criminal activities by usa corporates entirely contradicts ex usa=20 >> state sec hillary clinton's claim of usa supporting open=20 >> communications & internet. >> i am copying this mail to the authorities & would appreciate ria's=20 >> support in calling for an end to this kind of criminal power abuse=20 >> from usa (indeed, any) corporates >> >> re: newton's opticks >> i have attached to this mail the original application ('Formal=20 >> Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence that=20 >> counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from Isaac=20 >> Newton's Opticks & therefrom', in open office doc) >> this application sets out in step-by-step format the various=20 >> observations with prism, mirror, etc. >> >> as you correctly stated: if my observations are wrong then everything=20 >> falls; >> i countered: if my observations are correct (which they are) then a=20 >> significant amount of 350 years of science falls (which they do) >> >> these observations confirm that prisms do NOT split out white light=20 >> into 'rainbow' patterns, the patterns appear at boundary edges, the=20 >> patterns conform to those patterns from radar/radio transmissions, as=20 >> realised by experimental measurements, and of the form of a main=20 >> forward transmission lobe & 2 sets of twin side-band lobes (r & y and=20 >> v & b); o being the mergence of r&y, i being the mergence of v&b; and=20 >> g the mergence of y&b which occurs when two boundaries are brought=20 >> into close proximity to form a slit; it is at the slit that the 2=20 >> colour patterns (roy & vib) merge and hence transmit to & thru the=20 >> prism, NOT by the prism splitting out white light. >> the other steps in the attached document give further insights. >> >> please avoid thinking in terms of fourier or maxwell or of any other=20 >> mathematical models; observe purely from first principles. all the=20 >> mathematics are SUBSEQUENT to newton's errors, and on the later=20 >> assumption that light is frequency based (incorrect it now turns=20 >> out), as it now can be seen to be arc-angle related; and any=20 >> magnitude scale can be artificially 'transformed' into a frequency=20 >> range about any chosen base. >> >> these new science observations compel a formal meeting so as to=20 >> garner other ideas from other professionals - as i pointed out to you=20 >> in our discussion, children are being taught incorrect science, this=20 >> needs urgent attention. also urgency for addressing subsequent=20 >> theories based upon incorrect opticks; especially those that have=20 >> legal implications such as evidence. furthermore, medical research is=20 >> impeded because we do not properly understand how the universe=20 >> functions. and so on. >> >> in short newton's opticks are wrong; hence michelson-morley is wrong,=20 >> hence einstein is wrong. >> it is also important to recognise that einstein's theories were=20 >> initially of philosophical form, when he first derived his energy &=20 >> relativity theories; brilliant though they are, they are wrong. it=20 >> was hubble that gave 'confirmation' by claiming doppler effect on=20 >> distant stars/galaxies due to 'red shift' >> >> BUT, further thought will realise that hubble had misinterpreted what=20 >> he saw, just as today astronomers are misinterpreting what they see=20 >> when observing deep space. >> this needs further work. >> >> the aforegoing addresses the physics science that needs urgent=20 >> attention. >> my other areas of r&d are in the pioneering of Economy Engineering,=20 >> developing understandings of why economies continually boom/bust &=20 >> developing solutions thereto. >> just as physics science has gone off-track so too has economic=20 >> science, with devastating consequences for billions impoverished=20 >> around the world & for destabilising of developed nations. this needs=20 >> even more urgent work, i can only do so much - governments are=20 >> refusing to listen >> >> all this is why we need to establish a formal meeting with urgency. >> >> sincerely >> >> Chris Addington Pr.Eng. >> >> On 19/03/2013 09:29, Luke Drury wrote: >>> Dear Mr Addington, >>> >>> As I recall I agreed to look at a short statement of your objection=20 >>> to Isaac Newton's prism experiment. To date I have not received=20 >>> such a statement, but when I do I will respond to it. I have to say=20 >>> that, as I responded in my Hamilton talk when I think this first=20 >>> came up, that electromagnetism and optics is perhaps the best=20 >>> understood and best verified part of physics. I am not sure what=20 >>> you understand by Newton's prism experiment, but it is generally=20 >>> taken to mean the demonstration that white light (as perceived by=20 >>> our eyes) can be split up into different spectral components=20 >>> (perceived by us as colours) which in a modern interpretation we=20 >>> would consider to correspond to different frequencies or=20 >>> wavelengths. You will be familiar I take it with Fourier analysis=20 >>> from your training as an engineer and I take it that there is no=20 >>> dispute about the basics ideas of Fourier decompositions etc. If=20 >>> you accept that light shows aspects of a wave character (as easily=20 >>> demonstrated by numerous diffraction phenomena) and accept Fourier=20 >>> analysis, then I really don't see how you can doubt the=20 >>> interpretation that Newton in his prism experiment basically showed=20 >>> that you could filter white light through a narrow-pass filter to=20 >>> isolate a narrow spectral band. >>> >>> Luke Drury >>> >>> PS for your information, I mentioned that I has an eye operation=20 >>> scheduled for the day after we met. This uncovered some=20 >>> complications and I have been off for the last two weeks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. >>> (Email Guard: 9.0.0.2308, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.21080) >>> http://www.pctools.com/ >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> >> > --------------000805090009000309000109 Content-Type: text/html; charset="WINDOWS-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-------- Original Message --------
Subje= ct: UPDATE 3: New Academic Year pending -> urgency for & logistics of correcting school texts, progressing further R&D, codification of science principles/theories, processes for challenges thereto - Re: Reply to RIA Luke Drury + eircom destroying mails Re: UPDATE 2: Formal Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence that counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from Isaac Newton's Opticks & therefrom
Date:= Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:26:12 +0100
From:= Chris Addington
To: <= /th> Luke Drury <ld@cp.dias.ie>
CC: <= /th> privateoffice@taoiseach.gov.ie, taoiseach@taoiseach.gov.ie, eamon.gilmore@= tanaiste.gov.ie, "Chief Justice (Ireland) Susan Denham" <susandenham@courts.ie>, webmaster@president.ie= , Commissioner Garda <Commissioner@garda.ie>, Commissioner Garda Ops <commissioner_ops@garda.ie>, fergus.healy@garda.ie, pressoffice@garda.ie, research@garda.ie, adrianhardiman@courts.ie, aineoconnor@courts.ie, TomDaly@courts.ie, sfadmin@eircom.net, richard.bruton@djei.ie, richard.bruton@oireachtas.ie, finian.mcgrath@oireachtas.ie, Averil Power <Averil.Power@Oireachtas.ie>, Aodhan ORiordain <Aodhan.ORiordain@Oireachtas.ie>


=20

=20
=20

TO:

Royal Irish Academy RIA, President, Luke Drury


Royal Dublin Society RDS,

Royal Institute RI,

Royal Society RS,

Royal Meteorological Society RMetS,

Royal Observatory RO,

Royal Marsden Hospital RMH,

Royal Academy of Engineering RAE,

Royal Astronomer:


- Presidents/Chairpersons, Executives & Members



CC: HM Queen Elizabeth II

Privy Council - Lord President Nick Clegg & Privy Councillors

BT

CERN

& as per addressees & general



April 8, 2013


Re: UPDATE 3: New Academic Year pending -> urgency for & logistics of correcting school texts, progressing further R&D, codification of science principles/theories, processes for challenges thereto -

(Formal Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence that counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from Isaac Newton's Opticks & therefrom


& retransmission of the founding 'Formal Application for meeting' on March 19)



To RIA President, Luke Drury




Dear Luke Drury


Subsequent to the retransmission of the 'Formal Application for meeting' - it is clear that much of Newton's Opticks is wrong & that other science principles derived therefrom are also wrong.


A new academic year is fast approaching (September) for European schools, academies, universities - in other regions new academic year starts next January - nevertheless there are pressing issues that need attention to ensure that corrected school texts are in place for the next academic year. There is not much time left for completion of these pressing issues.


There is still much science & associated engineering that needs to be done simply to address the basics of the errors & to correctly define the new science & to ensure correct engineering verification of same.


In addition the administrative planning & logistics of replacing old incorrect texts with new texts requires considerable efforts, and can only be executed once the science/engineering & verification is complete.


Once this process is underway I feel sure that it will quickly become clear that science principles/theories need to be codified or formally listed & indexed, and with administrative processes & procedures to handle challenges to existing theories. Such an initiative would need to be centralised. It would be beneficial for Ireland & RIA if the RIA were to take on these global responsibilities, vis: for formal codification/listing (similar to Darwinian taxonomy?) & for administrative process of challenges.

Government should also be approached for assistance in this regard; and, later, for contributions from other nations; as both these are mammoth tasks.


I respectfully urge that a prompt meeting, as requested in my Formal Application, is established to address both the physics science/engineering & to plan the administrative logistics. I am available at reasonably short notice now that school term has recommenced & would appreciate from you suggested dates, times & venue for a meeting and your views on a draft agenda for same.


I point out that the issues for this meeting address only physics science/engineering - we need also to begin addressing the numerous gross errors pertaining to 'economic science' as economies throughout the world are in severe distress due to incorrect national socio-economy policies based upon those 'science' errors.

There is urgent need to progress correct Economy Science & Economy Engineering




Sincerely



Chris Addington Pr.Eng.


cdadd2@gmail.com, cdadd3@= eircom.net,

+353 (0)86 168 4318


Chris Addington Pr.Eng.<=
/pre>
          On 20/03/2013 09:39, Chris Addington wrote:
=
to ria - president, luke drury
cc as per addressees & general
from chris addington pr.eng.

dear luke drury

thankyousincerely4yourreply

i understand the delay in your reply & hope all is now well re your recent op.

re: mails - the fact that you have not received an earlier mail from me (with application for meeting re newton's opticks) indicates that eircom (& upc.ie, & diamatrix.co.za, all being owned/controlled by usa corporates) have purposefully destroyed my mails sent via their server system. this is a clear criminal abuse of power by corporate juristic persons in one sovereign state over persons in another sovereign state; criminal interferences in sovereign affairs, an issue that respective governments are obligated to stop; and which criminal activities by usa corporates entirely contradicts ex usa state sec hillary clinton's claim of usa supporting open communications & internet.
i am copying this mail to the authorities & would appreciate ria's support in calling for an end to this kind of criminal power abuse from usa (indeed, any) corporates

re: newton's opticks
i have attached to this mail the original application ('Formal Application for meeting to hear & consider new science evidence that counters & hence disproves long-standing science stemming from Isaac Newton's Opticks & therefrom', in open office doc)
this application sets out in step-by-step format the various observations with prism, mirror, etc.

as you correctly stated: if my observations are wrong then everything falls;
i countered: if my observations are correct (which they are) then a significant amount of 350 years of science falls (which they do)

these observations confirm that prisms do NOT split out white light into 'rainbow' patterns, the patterns appear at boundary edges, the patterns conform to those patterns from radar/radio transmissions, as realised by experimental measurements, and of the form of a main forward transmission lobe & 2 sets of twin side-band lobes (r & y and v & b); o being the mergence of r&y, i being the mergence of v&b; and g the mergence of y&b which occurs when two boundaries are brought into close proximity to form a slit; it is at the slit that the 2 colour patterns (roy & vib) merge and hence transmit to & thru the prism, NOT by the prism splitting out white light.
the other steps in the attached document give further insights.

please avoid thinking in terms of fourier or maxwell or of any other mathematical models; observe purely from first principles. all the mathematics are SUBSEQUENT to newton's errors, and on the later assumption that light is frequency based (incorrect it now turns out), as it now can be seen to be arc-angle related; and any magnitude scale can be artificially 'transformed' into a frequency range about any chosen base.

these new science observations compel a formal meeting so as to garner other ideas from other professionals - as i pointed out to you in our discussion, children are being taught incorrect science, this needs urgent attention. also urgency for addressing subsequent theories based upon incorrect opticks; especially those that have legal implications such as evidence. furthermore, medical research is impeded because we do not properly understand how the universe functions. and so on.

in short newton's opticks are wrong; hence michelson-morley is wrong, hence einstein is wrong.
it is also important to recognise that einstein's theories were initially of philosophical form, when he first derived his energy & relativity theories; brilliant though they are, they are wrong. it was hubble that gave 'confirmation' by claiming doppler effect on distant stars/galaxies due to 'red shift'

BUT, further thought will realise that hubble had misinterpreted what he saw, just as today astronomers are misinterpreting what they see when observing deep space.
this needs further work.

the aforegoing addresses the physics science  that needs urgent attention.
my other areas of r&d are in the pioneering of Economy Engineering, developing understandings of why economies continually boom/bust & developing solutions thereto.
just as physics science has gone off-track so too has economic science, with devastating consequences for billions impoverished around the world & for destabilising of developed nations. this needs even more urgent work, i can only do so much - governments are refusing to listen

all this is why we need to establish a formal meeting with urgency.

sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

On 19/03/2013 09:29, Luke Drury wrote:
Dear Mr Addington,

As I recall I agreed to look at a short statement of your objection to Isaac Newton's prism experiment.  To date I have not received such a statement, but when I do I will respond to it.  I have to say that, as I responded in my Hamilton talk when I think this first came up, that electromagnetism and optics is perhaps the best understood and best verified part of physics.    I am not= sure what you understand by Newton's prism experiment, but it is generally taken to mean the demonstration that white light (as perceived by our eyes) can be split up into different spectral components (perceived by us as colours) which in a modern interpretation we would consider to correspond to different frequencies or wavelengths.  You will be familiar I take it with Fourier analysis from your training as an engineer and I take it that there is no dispute about the basics ideas of Fourier decompositions etc.  If you accept that light shows aspects of a wave character (as easily demonstrated by numerous diffraction phenomena) and accept Fourier analysis, then I really don't see how you can doubt the interpretation that Newton in his prism experiment basically showed that you could filter white light through a narrow-pass filter to isolate a narrow spectral band.

Luke Drury

PS for your information, I mentioned that I has an eye operation scheduled for the day after we met.  This uncovered some complications and I have been off for the last two weeks.






=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.2308, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.21080)
http://www.pctools.com/
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D








= --------------000805090009000309000109--