Received: from mail68.mimecast.co.za (41.74.197.68) by mail.uct.ac.za (137.158.154.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:18:57 +0200 Received: from mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.16]) by mail68.mimecast.co.za; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:18:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 5368 messnum 2750858 invoked from network[213.94.190.11/avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 8 Jul 2013 06:18:54 -0000 Received: from avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (213.94.190.11) by mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 5368) with SMTP; 8 Jul 2013 06:18:54 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([86.45.8.209]) by avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net with Cloudmark Gateway id xiDU1l00A4WbzTJ01iDXc0; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 07:14:08 +0100 Message-ID: <51DA586F.1000303@eircom.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:13:03 +0100 From: Chris Addington User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 To: undisclosed-recipients:; Subject: RIA Discourse: Torture, Terrorism & Memory; Justice, Revenge, Terrorism, What is Which & Which is What; Who's Terrorising Who; Small Claim Court, Dublin:- Chris Addington vs Royal Irish Academy X-MC-Unique: 113070808185500302 Return-Path: cdadd4@eircom.net X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: SRVWINEXC002.wf.uct.ac.za X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090406070409090209000607" --------------090406070409090209000607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable *INDEX:* *- RIA Discourse - Torture, Terrorism & Memory* *- Justice, Revenge, Terrorism; What is Which & Which is What* *-Who's Terrorising Who* *- Small Claim Court Dublin: Chris Addington vs Royal Irish Academy* *RIA Discourse Wednesday June 26, 2013 18h00* *Torture, Terrorism & Memory* Professors: Richard English (St Andrews, rle2@st-andrews.ac.uk) & Shane O'Mara (TCD, smomara@tcd.ie) *Reply:* Adrian Hardiman The joint Discourse was interesting & informative not only for=20 presenting an overview of physical & psychological damage that can occur=20 within human-brains from torture & terrorism (Shane O'Mara), but also=20 for highlighting the false 'political correctness' in the the historical=20 & political developments, especially post 9/11 (Richard English) (RIA should be putting slides & recording onto their website - viewing=20 is recommended) The falsities were reinforced by RIA President Luke Drury's continued=20 suppression of truths & Academic Freedom - by his ignoring of raised=20 hands in question time. What was also glaringly evaded, was the distinction between Terrorist &=20 Freedom-Fighter - this was totally ignored, by both presenters and by=20 Adrian Hardiman, a Supreme Court Judge. The concept of western Economy=20 Terrorism was also ignored. False 'Political Correctness' was, overarchingly, the implied theme -=20 and it was a great pity that O'Mara's presentation should have been=20 tainted with the false 'political correctness' of English's presentation=20 & Hardiman's reply. Whilst the presentation by Shane O'Mara was interesting (& unsettling)=20 insofar as the technical aspects of torture & terrorism, it was clear=20 that ideology, as presented by Richard English, has become rutted since=20 9/11, and maintaining George Bush's warped interpretations of Justice,=20 Revenge & Terrorism of almost 11 years ago (see below). The truth about 'Who's Terrorising Who' (also see below) remains=20 entrapped in political correctness, and Hardiman's reply confirmed the=20 Judiciary's ploys in maintaining this incorrect 'correctness'. (The=20 papers below were developed prior to understandings of the Twin Towers=20 having been imploded, and long prior to torontohearings.org, which was=20 justified by CDADD's definitive proof of implosions, vis: absence of=20 transfer-of-momentum dynamics for a natural collapse, consequently=20 additional high-impulse, explosive, forces were present, and=20 sequentially, which by definition is an implosion) Richard English assisted in the peace settlement in Northern Ireland,=20 but this was a politically correct settlement not a grass-roots solution=20 - which is why conflict is continuing/increasing. The same is happening=20 elsewheres in the world & with Russia becoming increasingly polarised. Terrorism is long-term torture maintaining memories - which is why NI,=20 Afghanistan, Syria, Egypt, Libya are constantly on the boil - but the=20 causal terrorism is the West's Economy Terrorism, those oppressed are=20 merely fighting for valid freedoms. The turmoil in Egypt with public protest calls for President Morsi's=20 resignation & with Military undertones added to the noise (& Morsi now=20 having been ousted), ignores the realities that it doesn't matter who is=20 in power, that the person in power has no hope of defeating the west's=20 oppressive Economy Terrorism - except by engaging Economy Engineering. Egypt's turmoil exists BECAUSE Morsi could not solve the economic=20 problems, BECAUSE no one can whilst the West impose oppressive Economy=20 Terrorism - except by engaging Economy Engineering. Turmoil will continue until such time as; a new dictator takes control -=20 and one that is pleasing to the USA; or some sense comes into play. Whether that dictator comes about through 'democratic' manipulations as=20 occurred in Russia or through armed onslaught as occurs in Syria is=20 immaterial to the fact that 'peace' & 'stability' will only come about=20 when the USA are pleased. The West, especially the USA, are purposefully wanting economic=20 instability, because it means they can control & take resources as they=20 demand. Political Correctness does not/cannot bring Grass-Roots Solutions - only=20 Economy Engineering will achieve this RIA President Luke Drury referred (to effect) to the mergement of the=20 sciences with the humanities; but those in the humanities merely assume=20 (wrongly so) that those in the sciences are telling the truth regarding=20 their science theories -> BUT, we know that Luke Drury & RIA & academia=20 are not honest about this. And this was abundantly clear when I asked Richard English (after=20 closure, because Luke Drury purposefully ignored my raised hand) why he=20 had ignored that the Twin Towers were imploded - English replied that=20 that was nonsense - I pressed him on this but after a few invalid=20 comments he went off in a huff to huddle with Luke Drury, Adrian=20 Hardiman & a few others, whose seething hostilities against me could be=20 cut with a knife. Richard English is an historian closed-minded to science evidence, and=20 readily open to popular sci-fi beliefs - which makes his analyses=20 unsound. English was influential, even though unqualified, in Tony=20 Blair's NI initiatives, it part-explains why Blair was misled into=20 political correctness rather than grass-roots solutions; and why Blair=20 is having little if any impact in the Middle East. Richard English is also a member of the RIA. English gave further distortions through emotive disparities; such as=20 referring to the Guildford IRA no-warning bombing, yet not referring to=20 the no-warning Brit Army attacks on IRA & NI people. (We can readily see=20 the continuing disparities today with the recent exposure of far less=20 rigour being applied to the investigations of murders by Brit Army=20 compared to those by the IRA. Richard English's presentation was fraught with unqualified assumptions=20 & emotive distortions, creating a heavily skewed picture far from the truth= . Shane O'Mara mainly kept to science facts, as obtained by his research,=20 and was convincing in his presentation; in stark contrast to that by=20 Richard English In Reply: Hardiman's reference to Ireland's standpoint toward political=20 refugees belies the fact that Ireland is now fully complicit in Economy=20 Terrorism causal of the oppressions that drives people to seek political=20 asylum. Hardiman's refusal, as a Supreme Court Judge, to uphold=20 Ireland's Constitution & to bring honesty into the RIA is contributory=20 to the cancerous spread of purposefully defective 'science' models that=20 maintain corporate Organised Crime that manifests as Economy Terrorism=20 and enforced by immoral Military Might; and which maintains incorrect=20 history. The issues of Edward Snowden & Julian Assange highlights the manner in=20 which 'political asylum' is wrongly meant to mean 'political imprisonment'. Ecuador was totally wrong to impose political silence upon Assange, and=20 to refuse (delay?) Snowden asylum, simply because they pursue political=20 freedom & expression. President Putin was wrong to impose conditions tantamount to political=20 imprisonment upon Snowden's political asylum application. The USA's argument that Snowden is a traitor is pure nonsense -=20 tantamount to arguing that an Auschwitz guard would have been a traitor=20 for revealing the truth. Whistle-blowing of Human Rights Violations is not traitorous, even the=20 USA's outdated Constitution recognises the obligations of upholding=20 Rights, by all. President Obama is being entirely disingenuous by keeping distance from=20 these events - it is he that can & should & must ensure Rights protections. USA has not ratified its signature to the Rome Statute & UDHR; that=20 alone is a compelling reason for all signatory nations to offer asylum. Whether a Roman Emperor compelling conflict within a closed Coliseum; or=20 a Nazi guard compelling ingestion of Zyklon-B within a closed 'shower',=20 or a President compelling civil conflict through oppressive=20 socio-economic disparities -> the effects are identical -> Genocide. The real difference being that modern day Presidents achieve a far, far,=20 far more efficient kill-rate (with the assistance of compliant Chief=20 Justices). The increasing polarisation between West & East, driven by the West's=20 Economy Terrorism, is abundantly clear as further demonstrated by the=20 recent Taliban attack on the Afghan Presidential compound, CIA base &=20 various surrounding embassies. And this attack after President Obama=20 promoted talks with the Taliban. Political Correctness will not bring grass-roots solutions. Terrorism is long-term torture maintaining memories, caused by the West,=20 and with the full complicity of abusive, dishonest Powers that lack=20 Authority within Academia -> producing reactionary freedom fighting=20 (wrongly tagged as fundamentalist terrorism) Listen to the RIA recordings & view the slides but keep perspective over=20 the gross distortions (www.ria.ie) Sincerely Chris Addington Pr.Eng. Justice, Revenge, Terrorism What is Which & Which is What Colesberg (SA) lies almost equidistant between Johannesburg and Cape=20 Town on National Route 1 in the stark but beautiful Karoo landscape. The=20 typical flat-topped karoo koppie of Cole's kop, a British Gun position=20 in the Boer War, stands out as singularly attractive amongst the landscape. On Monday July 8, 2002 at approximately 22h40 whilst Colesberg=20 sheepshearers slumbered(?) on a cold wintry night CNN beamed to=20 Colesberg, amongst other global points, President Bush at a White House=20 media briefing and Q&A session. During his discourse Bush used the words "Justice" and "Revenge" and=20 shortly thereafter "Terrorism". Exhaustion, from a night drive to Colesberg along a road-worked black=20 ribbon "highway", was suddenly broken not so much by the words but more=20 by the unconvincing manner in which the words were used. It was clear=20 that Bush did not understand the meanings of the words he was using; and=20 more importantly he put across that the import of "terrorism" was that=20 of somebody attacking the United States or its peoples. Clear=20 misunderstanding. So what do these words mean, practically. The dictionary does not give=20 practical insight merely academic qualification. Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary states: * Justice -- the quality of being just: integrity, impartiality, rightness, the awarding of what is due: a judge, a magistrate. * Revenge -- to inflict injury in retribution, to avenge, an act of inflicting a malicious injury in return for injury received: the desire for retaliation of evil. * Terrorism -- an organised system of intimidation, to create extreme fear. The context of Bushes statements were in regard to Osama and his=20 objective of "getting" him. Depending on which side of the fence one is sitting determines the=20 interpretation & application of each of these 3 words. To Osama Sept 11 was possibly revenge for US's ongoing aggression=20 (terrorism) - either directly by US's own military intervention, or=20 indirectly by supplies of mass destruction war-weapons to other parties. To Bush Sept 11 was possibly terrorism by a fundamentalist who had total=20 disregard for justice. But Osama, like everyone else, could not access the kind of justice that=20 Bush interprets from that word. There is a need to define in practical terms these words. As a first pass in attempting to give practical definition:- Justice: The practical & observable outcomes of an ideal justice system=20 in which on each & every occasion of dispute that the outcome of each=20 dispute is resolved effectively & efficiently, with an optimum=20 determination such that collectively both parties receive optimum=20 satisfaction, and have reached an understanding of & accepted their=20 opponents position, and are able to live in harmony. The aforegoing can only be achieved if a justice system is open,=20 transparent, accessible, understandable, focused on mediation as a first=20 stage & integral justice process, Revenge: - a micro act. Given an ideal Justice System: - an individual exacting revenge against=20 another for injury received without first seeking recourse through the=20 Justice System. Alternatively; not accepting the outcome of an ideal=20 Justice System Terrorism:- a macro act of revenge by groups of people But:- there is not one country in the world that has a just Justice=20 System. Consequently outcomes of disputes leave parties in a non-optimal=20 outcome state, and most often a far worse position, thus a party=20 harbours greater resentment & anger, and can choose to exact revenge. People globally know that justice is not present within Justice Systems=20 therefore the majority do not use the system They either write-off the=20 dispute, or harbour resentment and a revenge attitude. Historically the per-unit destructive power of one person was relatively=20 small: in increasing order: sticks & stones, metal weapons, bows & arrows. Then explosives were discovered and the per-unit destructive power took=20 a huge leap with guns & cannons, thus requiring fewer people to effect=20 previous levels of destruction. In under a century the per-unit=20 destructive power has made exponential quantum leaps to date with,=20 progressively:- tanks, planes, missiles-conventional, nuclear, etc.. Twin Towers was a macro-revenge act (terrorism) in which airplanes=20 carrying people were flown & aimed at other people, in revenge for US=20 missiles being flown & aimed at other people. Both events occurred because of the absence of a global forum that is=20 open, transparent, accessible, understandable, focused on mediation as a=20 first stage & integral justice process, in which people or societies can=20 effectively & efficiently resolve disputes. But before this can be achieved on a global, macro, scale it is=20 imperative that just Justice Systems are developed first on a micro scale. Until then it is impossible, because of fence positions, to differentiate between US & Osama (& others) - to determine what is which & which is what Chris Addington Pr.Eng. +27 (0)83 962 7098, *Who's Terrorising Who* (UPDATE JULY 2013: This paper was developed some 3 years prior to=20 CDADD's proofs of Twin Towers implosions, which justified the Toronto=20 Hearings, torontohearings.org Vis: absence of transfer-of-momentum dynamics for a natural collapse,=20 consequently additional high-impulse, explosive, forces were present,=20 and sequentially, which by definition is an implosion) The World Trade Centre & Pentagon attacks were events caused by a=20 micro-subset of the world's population which is having macro-global=20 repercussions. There is really no difference between a missile flown & aimed at a mass=20 of people, and an aircraft containing people being flown & aimed at a=20 target containing other people. Commonalities between this event and past events need addressing to=20 ensure that effective solutions are found for the future. The intention=20 is not to offend anyone but to determine the truth behind events which=20 are leading to global destabilisation. Much of the current global conflict is centred around the Middle East=20 and is as a consequence of the aggressive standpoint of Israel combined=20 with USA's 'spy versus spy' & cloak & dagger political manipulations=20 (coup engineering etc.) The USA has, since WW1 and more so since WW2, become polarised from the=20 Monroe Doctrine - which was a policy decision not to become embroiled in=20 European/Global issues. The USA has increasingly in the past 5 decades=20 been responsible for manipulating the affairs of other sovereign states=20 for their, the US's, perceived benefit. However in all cases the US's manipulations have back fired with huge=20 loss of life and resultant increased complexities in world relations. Part of the problem that has led to current situations is that there are=20 "secret" (non-transparent) societies/groups that manoeuvre & manipulate=20 into power positions. Whether the power base is political, financial,=20 social, or other, the various groups organise themselves upon cultural=20 or ideological or other lines, and use their collective influence for=20 the benefit of their own limited membership and at the expense of=20 society as a whole. Masons & legal practitioners are examples of such=20 secret societies. But historically a more powerful group has had long standing influence=20 in world events. For want of a name:- JPP will suffice - Jewish Power=20 Players. According to the SA Jewish Museum in Cape Town there are 14 Million Jews=20 in the world as of 2000. Israel 5 Million. US 6 Million, SA 90,000, Europe mainly the balance=20 with small numbers in various countries. We have seen over the past 5 decades increasing aggressiveness by Israel=20 against its neighbours - immediate & close distanced. Recent responses to suicide bombers have resulted in disproportionate=20 action by Israel's military which is supplied by the USA with powerful=20 hi-tech weapons. How is it possible that such a minuscule group of people, out of a world=20 population of billions, and who are largely fragmented throughout the=20 world, can cause so much trouble? It is impossible to correlate a conventional bomb (whether a suicide=20 bomber is attached to it or not) with even one missile from an attack=20 aircraft against an opponent; but this is Israel's standard tactic. It would be unacceptable for Britain to respond with missile attacks to=20 every IRA bomb. The majority of' Jews are faith-loving people -- they go about their=20 normal daily business as do most people and integrate with society as=20 most social groups do; but a minuscule minority of' this minuscule=20 population group engage in Power Playing for their own gain, and at the=20 expense of others, the majority in the world. The world has been brainwashed into a distorted viewpoint of the holocaust. A Thumbnail Sketch of the 20th Century (see Historical Archives - brings=20 truth to these distortions) -- but further issues need to be examined,=20 because a simple statement that Hitler was a monster hides the truth=20 behind the holocaust. Germany after WW1 was a defeated nation which the Allies continued to=20 humiliate and keep down. The people of Germany were desperate, facing=20 abject poverty, hunger etc.; however these people saw that a certain=20 section of the population were still affluent - the Power Players, and=20 amongst whom many were JPPs - this was where the hate for Jews began to=20 breed. Just as much as a person denying another water in the middle of a desert=20 creates a life issue, so does denying a nation its dignity create a life=20 issue. These issues must also be viewed against the horrifying backdrop of WW1. These people did not have the support that we see today -- e.g. the=20 families of the victims of the World Trade Centre being counselled to=20 deal with the trauma. Not only was WWI more than a million-fold more horrific, but there was=20 not the slightest thought of trauma counselling, nor did the Allies=20 assist in re-establishing the fundamentals of human dignity to a=20 defeated nation. In fact they actively kept them down thus breeding=20 intense anger & haired Consequently people such as Hitler developed intense hatred for the=20 affluent JPPs who were abusing them further. And Hitler was merely the=20 individual who came to the fore, if it had not been him it would have=20 been another person. It is important to reiterate that the JPPs were a minuscule minority of=20 a minuscule group of people, but their Power base gave them tremendous=20 leverage. The small but powerful/influential JPPs in the USA have afforded Israel=20 a tremendous Power leverage through financial & armaments support. The US was therefore part of Israel's military machine as a feeder into=20 Israel's supply line - in any war supply lines become legitimate=20 targets, as well as the cities & its populations that manufacture the=20 armaments that feed into the supply lines. So, as much as Berlin & other cities were legitimate WW2 targets, so was=20 the World Trade Centre a legitimate target for Israel's opponents (that=20 is not to say that they necessarily committed the act). What really needs to be addressed is the aggressive Power Playing of=20 Israel that has led to the breeding of intense hatred against Israel &=20 USA & other countries supporting Israel. Blair & Bush's stated=20 objectives of targeting bin Laden addresses the people not the problem,=20 which problem they were responsible for in the first instance. Question:- What changed bin Laden from an acceptable schoolboy=20 (attending a UK school) to a person with such anger against Israel/USA?=20 - the answer to this is a similar answer to the question of: What=20 changed Hitler from a reasonable schoolboy into a hated leader? Answer:-=20 JPPs! NOTE: NOT faith-loving Jews To argue that Hitler was born a monster raises the potential of babies=20 being 'examined' to determine which ones are good and which bad.=20 Manipulation of circumstances are what can lead to anger, the anger is=20 not inherent in people. It is important to recall:- JPPs are a minuscule number of a minuscule=20 population group The majority of this minuscule population group are average people who=20 go about their daily business as much as any law abiding person. It is=20 the minuscule number of Power Players that need to be looked at closely;=20 whether they are Power Players in the Social, Financial, Political,=20 Justice or other areas.. London Weekly Telegraph: edition no. 531, Sept/Oct 2001 --- Pg 34,=20 Obituaries, S Z Arkoff:- a "B" movie mogul - whose stated rule was: "Once something works, why not milk it dry?" Milking something dry carries the full impact of destroying that which=20 others, workers, are trying to build up to ensure security. On. the micro level, the repercussions of such a policy causes grief for=20 a number of individuals. But these individuals are able to be absorbed=20 into society through, mobility before changing jobs, social security=20 etc. such that the intensity of the grief is reduced. On the macro level, nations are unable to absorb mass unemployment as a=20 result of nations being milked dry. Consequently individual grief becomes collective grief which turns to anger= . People become motivated by certain individuals who become their=20 spokespeople & leaders. However those Power Players who are milking them=20 dry are the same ones that have manipulated the "law" to their favour;=20 thus the leaders acting on behalf of the aggrieved are criminalised and=20 removed from society (this happened to Hitler). These leaders become increasingly angry, and eventually revenge comes to=20 the fore. This is why a nation, of which Hitler became the head, was driven by the=20 Allies & JPPs to exact the worst kind of revenge this world has seen to=20 date. It is therefore crucial that the world is not misled by the import of=20 the phrase "Rule of Law"; the Law as we know it has been prostituted by=20 JPPs and other minority Power Player Groups so that the majority are=20 held to ransom. The world needs to focus on "Rule of Just Law" and a common constitution=20 developed to protect rights. The European Union's constitution is a=20 worthless document because of the absence, amongst other issues, of a=20 Bill of Rights. In South Africa, the world's most advanced Constitution has been=20 emasculated and is essentially worthless as the Legal professionals, a=20 minuscule minority group (of which JPPs comprise a large=20 disproportionate percentage), have retained full justice power for=20 themselves. Backtracking of the development of the SA Constitution and how the=20 President of the Constitutional Court (later, the first Chief Justice)=20 emasculated it through the manipulating of the Rules of Court can be=20 easily seen. The Jewish population of SA is around 90.000 (less than half a percent=20 of the total SA population) yet the Constitutional Court has over 30%=20 Jewish representation, clearly a disparity. The High Courts are not much=20 better. Therefore South Africa is held to ransom by JPPs and other people that=20 have been bought off. Examination of Constitutional Court records will=20 prove that fellow Jewish legal practitioners are protected by these=20 judges - consequently "Rule of Law" in SA is by an effective Judicial=20 Autocracy, through manipulation of the laws to their own benefit, and at=20 the expense of society as a whole. A visit to the SA Jewish Museum in Cape Town reveals an interesting=20 observation. There is little difference, barring clenched fingers,=20 between Hitler's salute and that of the salute of the President of the=20 SA's Constitutional Court; the fact that judicial officers feel the need=20 for salutes is a cause for concern in itself. Examination of subsequent=20 events confirm the need for concern. Are we to endure decades of distorted brainwashing over the WTC issue? Branding of the perpetrators as evil, lunatic, fundamentalists ignores=20 the disproportionate, fundamentalist standpoint of Israel's JPPs who=20 responded with missiles and heavy military hardware to low key=20 conventional bombs. A person being attached to a bomb doesn't change the effect of that=20 bomb, human emotions wrongly elevate the horror and creates further=20 polarisation. What really needs to be addressed is:- what are the issues that would=20 drive an individual to adopt a suicide attitude? Answering this brings one back to Power Players manipulating societies=20 such that intense feelings of anger & hatred are created. The wave of suicide bombings are a recent occurrence, so it would be=20 unreasonable to label the perpetrators of WTC as fundamentally suicidal. Events drove them to extreme measures, much as war drives any "normal"=20 person to doing things they normally would not do, including actions=20 that would be viewed as suicidal (scrambling out of a WW1 trench=20 directly into a hail of bullets, rescuing wounded from battlefields with=20 bullets & bombs buzzing thickly around, air defence of Malta in WW2 etc.=20 etc. etc. etc. etc.) The "suicidal" attacks on Israel are little different to these in=20 requiring a mindset shift to carry out the deeds. There has been a call, since the attacks on the WTC, for a=20 re-examination and improvement of National Psyches - this cannot be=20 achieved until such time as social systems have accessible forums (vis:=20 open accessible courts) for the resolving of disputes, both horizontally=20 and vertically. Further: to uplift National Psyche it is necessary for governments to=20 act morally in all areas. The world is accustomed to; wealth being stripped from individuals=20 through immoral taxation to satisfy government greed motives; immorality=20 that is created through closed and inaccessible courts; immoral=20 legislation that ignores true governance but instead focuses on=20 governance through the threat of criminalisation of people. The fairly recent Microsoft anti-trust issue is a clear case of the USA=20 Power Player's view that large money is equal to power. It is=20 inconceivable to suggest that Microsoft were anything but monopolists;=20 yet the Appeal judiciary emasculated years of effort in attempts to=20 protect societies from these practices. But the true failure of the=20 justice system occurred decades ago because the various competitors of=20 Microsoft had no means of opposing MS's might in open accessible courts;=20 simply because USA courts (like all other countries) do not have open=20 accessible courts. The MS antitrust case appeal merely confirmed that=20 courts are closed and inaccessible. There has been a further call for a refocus on Tax Havens that, it is=20 claimed, are allowing terrorists to launder money through confidential=20 accounts. The issue of addressing money-laundering is easily solved by=20 creating a body that can have access to haven accounts but retaining=20 confidentiality for non money-launderers. However the real thrust of the=20 war on tax havens was to attack citizens who had acted reasonably and=20 set up asset protection trusts & businesses in havens. Threatening Tax Havens (see "War on Tax Havens") will ultimately=20 generate more anger in small island states that are merely having to=20 uplift themselves through fair economic competitive advantage. How will the pressure from these threats of war be released? Small, seemingly innocuous, issues can escalate into revenge issues if=20 individuals are deprived. Individuals have increasingly powerful weapons readily available; thus=20 stable societies are easily open to disruption. There appears to be two main issues that cause anger within societies to=20 erupt into revenge:_ when have-nots are deprived further of upliftment benefits, or when the=20 rate of achieving upliftment benefits are kept below acceptable levels. When, hope is destroyed or frustrated. Perhaps the solution to the Middle East is to create a no-mans land=20 between the parties, much as occurred between Gibraltar & Spain for some=20 20 or 30 years - to allow emotions to settle Perhaps it would be best to=20 have Jerusalem and other areas fall into a no-mans land. The costs of=20 this would be minimal compared to even one of the airstrikes in Afghanistan In summary: There is a clear & urgent need to establish a global sense of "Rule of=20 Just Law". JPP have been and still are collectively manipulating events in the=20 Middle East, and elsewhere, with the leveraged support of USA's military=20 arsenal, with disproportionate responses to conventional retaliatory=20 attacks. As a minuscule minority of the worlds population JPPs, with leveraged=20 USA military hardware power, are causing a eat deal of trouble. The USA is an accessory to these acts; and also are directly responsible=20 for their cloak & dagger manipulations. Collectively they have angered other nations/sects, created despotic=20 puppet governments, all of which is causing global destabilisation. Immoral government is exacerbating the destruction, or preventing the=20 development, of a positive National/Global Psyche. Oklahoma City, Dunblane, World Trade Centre are just a few examples that=20 show that individuals & small groups can exact revenge on a massive=20 scale for injustices perpetrated against them. Who's terrorising who?????? Chris Addington Pr.Eng. CDADD Consulting Services, South Africa +27 (0)83 962 7098 (UPDATE JULY 2013 - subsequent to this paper CDADD revealed the full=20 extent of Donald Gordon's pensions/investments frauds perpetrated=20 through Liberty Life, and globalised through 'Demutualisation', which=20 caused a progressive & massive flooding of Money Base & Supply with=20 artificial/counterfeit money, which when collapsed c2008 caused the=20 global economy meltdown. It was through these fraudulent monies that=20 Israel was funded to maintain its war-footing) *Ireland Small Claims Court* *Dublin* *Chris Addington Pr.Eng.* *versus* *Royal Irish Academy (RIA)* *AND TO:* *AFFECTED PARTIES:* *Taoiseach (PM)* *Tanaiste (DPM)* *Chief Justice* *Garda (Police) Commissioner* *Comptroller & Auditor General * *& INTERESTED PARTIES (including those of the General Public)* *June 15 to 25, 2013* *(To Small-Claim Court: 1. please see under section Claim: Point 4.5 2. Application cover-sheet under separate email) * *INDEX:* *- Preamble* *- Background* *- RIA's Customer Charter* *- Specifics of Claim* *- Claim* *Preamble:* I, the undersigned Christopher David Addington, am a Professional=20 Engineer (equivalent Chartered Engineer) I point out that every statement herein can be concretely proved to=20 Court, but avoid submitting such proofs herein as they are extremely=20 numerous & each lengthy. Consequently I set out matters in brief. If RIA=20 should challenge then proofs will be submitted. [From Court information: 'The small claims procedure is limited to: * a claim in respect of goods or services bought for private use from someone selling them in the course of a business (consumer claim). * a claim in respect of minor damage to property (but excluding personal injuries). * a claim in respect of the non-return of a rent deposit in relation to a holiday premises (actions relating to rent deposits for places of residence must be brought to the _Private Residential Tenancies Board _.) Excluded from the small claims procedure are claims for: 1. a hire-purchase agreement 2. a breach of leasing agreement 3. debts 4. personal injuries] A small claim may arise from sale/purchase of goods/service for private=20 use, or for minor property damage. Consumer is synonymous with Customer. This application concerns services provided by RIA as per their Customer=20 Charter/Contract, purchased with public/taxpayer funds that for=20 centuries has justified its very existence, which funds accrue from=20 private persons taxed so as to provide beneficial services to all, and=20 for consumption/use of same by private & public. A contractual failure, governance failure, will ALWAYS cause consequent=20 damage to property both private & public. It would be a bizarre situation if a minor damage small claim was=20 rejected simply because RIA could argue that they have done far greater=20 damage publicly therefore any one private small claim is invalid within=20 this Court because the aggregate exceeds the small claim limit. Similarly: RIA provide services to public & private persons as=20 Customer/s via its Customer/Royal Charter (see Customer Charter appended=20 below; RIA have disingenuously removed the Royal Charter from their=20 website (so it appears)- it would be bizarre to argue that the goods=20 were not actually bought directly by any one individual but via public=20 taxpayer funds, or to argue that service is not solely for private=20 personal consumption and aggregated into public consumption; hence for=20 RIA to wrongly argue it falls outside of a small claim. Since Governance violations ALWAYS incur property damage, and first on a=20 micro/small scale, later aggregating to macro-scale; it follows that=20 governance failures must be addressed promptly and before significant=20 property damage increases, it follows that governance violations fall=20 within the ambit of small claims. Even the threat of a governance=20 violation incurring consequent property damage justifies a small claim=20 application. The nature of this claim should be viewed in its correct light - that=20 this Court simply imposes, partly, an outcome that would have been the=20 case had the RIA correctly fulfilled its Governance obligations as per=20 its Charter/Contract- consequently this Claim should not be seen as a=20 penalty but simply an enforcement of what should have transpired in the=20 first instance. *This Court should also recognise the global implications of this=20 matter, and of Governance failures in general:* - the demonstrations against G8 currently (June 15) taking place outside=20 Dublin's Garden of Remembrance (& elsewheres) & the various & numerous=20 conflicts around the world such as Syria, Libya, Egypt, the Global=20 Economy Meltdown, etc., etc. - that these upheavals stem from economic=20 instability which derives from global corporate Organised Crime that=20 emanates as oppressive Economy Terrorism - which corporate abuses are=20 made possible by the applications of grossly defective & hence massively=20 destructive academic 'science' (physics & economics) models - which=20 'science' models give false credibility to otherwise fraudulent=20 corporate scams - which scams have over some 5 to 6 decades artificially=20 inflated global Money Base & Supply with artificial/counterfeit money -=20 which artificial money has grossly skewed economies destructively -=20 which destruction produces the anger & violence that we presently=20 observe - and which Tsunami backwash from collapsed Money Base & Supply=20 has caused the Global Economy Meltdown - and the consequent opposition=20 we observe in the Garden of Remembrance & elsewheres & the=20 understandable armed violence in opposition to Economy Terrorism in the=20 middle-east. The most notable of these defective economics models can be viewed at=20 Nobel Prize website - I point out that John Nash is the only Nobel Prize=20 winner to make a retraction (admittedly only partial) of his models due=20 to my R&D that disproved its validity. Significant Causal Dynamics within my R&D has been adjudicated by a=20 Central Bank Governor & 2 other eminent persons (proofs of same are=20 available). The polarisation between Vladimir Putin and other key G7's (Barack=20 Obama, David Cameron most notably) stems directly from the economic=20 turmoil created by oppressive western economic models utilised within=20 Russia post-Wall collapse. Putin recognises that the West's economic=20 models do not work, other than impose Economy Terrorism upon others,=20 including Russia; it leaves opposition as the only option available to=20 Putin (& Syria) - unless & until the West engage Economy Engineering &=20 develop stable economy systems & controls. But that is not possible if corporates & institutions can blatantly=20 evade Governance and as a consequence maintain corporate Organised Crime=20 which collectively produces Economy Terrorism. All this is why it is imperative that Governance violations are=20 addressed promptly BEFORE minor property & other damage increase to=20 major damage. A Governance violation is a small claim issue; the fact that enforced=20 compliance of a micro event brings macro benefits does not increase any=20 one claim beyond it being small. Ireland is signatory to the Rome Statute & Universal Declaration of=20 Human Rights; it follows that the UDHR is Supreme Law and that Ireland's=20 Constitution & Law are SUBORDINATE to the UDHR. Property under UDHR is all-inclusive: fixed, moveable, tangible, intangible= . In terms of Small Claims, 'damage to property' includes 'property' as=20 fully envisaged under the Constitution & Universal Declaration of Human=20 Rights (UDHR) - it would be an Article 30 violation of UDHR were this=20 full interpretation of 'property' not upheld - these are both fixed &=20 moveable, both tangible & intangible, and claims for property damage=20 include, are measured by, time-wastage costs in (self) rectification of=20 property damage. In short: Governance violations, although small issues in any one case,=20 collectively in the aggregate have massive DESTRUCTIVE macro-impacts -=20 Consequently enforced compliance, via a small claim, can also=20 collectively have massive CONSTRUCTIVE macro-impacts. *G8 are currently (June 18) meeting in Ireland to find ways to solve the=20 global economy problems - the Justice system needs, willingly, to be=20 part of the solution.* *Background* The RIA was intended to be & should be an academy for excellence in the=20 pursuit of the sciences & humanities and formed under Royal Charter by=20 King George III on January 28, 1786, BUT abusive actions by RIA=20 President & Council have grossly undermined this; subsequent to various=20 of my Intellectual Property inputs the RIA recently (2013) transformed=20 its juristic persona characteristics through the adoption of a Customer=20 Charter. It is pointed out that the Intellectual Property of mine,=20 consumed by the RIA, was not paid for by the RIA -> a governance=20 violation by RIA. The RIA's very existence has largely been possible due to support from=20 state funds, the state having been in various forms in Ireland's=20 history; nevertheless RIA funding has derived from State funds=20 essentially derived from taxpayers' monies (or from private monies=20 defrauded by corporate Organised Crime, concrete proofs available) In short a Contract has existed since inception of the RIA, between the=20 RIA & the public in its various & numerous forms from the singular=20 natural persona to juristic collective bodies, and the new Customer=20 Charter confirms such contract (charter & contract being synonymous terms) The same applies to all Royal Chartered & similar institutions globally. Royal Society Paul Nurse (the Speaker at the discourse referred to=20 herein) is also hostile toward me not only for my having disproved=20 Newton's Opticks but also for my demonstrating that the RS's history is=20 steeped in dishonesty stemming from Newton. Since beginning to attend various functions such as discourses,=20 seminars, conferences at the RIA I had noticed much lack of Governance.=20 My raising of objections created animosity, but nevertheless transforms=20 occurred, the new Customer Charter being one transform. Nevertheless animosity from RIA has strongly remained such that at=20 events the various chairpersons have clearly been instructed to ignore=20 my raised-hand during question time. I have also raised strong objection regarding the ex RIA president=20 Nicholas Canny publicly insulting Ireland's bus drivers with his=20 self-superior statements, no apology was forthcoming from RIA to the bus=20 drivers nor to myself for the attack against me for objecting. Much hostility by RIA has remained - on one occasion a Member physically=20 assaulted & orally insulted me whilst I objected to a governance=20 violation by RIA. Amongst my Professional Engineering work I have created clearer=20 understandings of why economies, locally & globally, go boom/bust, have=20 pioneered Economy Engineering; but have also pursued research &=20 development into physics. This research led to the realisation that=20 Newton's Opticks were wrong; and consequently Edwin Hubble's 'expanding=20 universe' & Albert Einstein's energy & relativity theories were wrong.=20 My R&D further showed, beyond any reasonable doubt, that Newton had=20 stolen the Intellectual Property behind the Opticks works. My R&D has also realised incorrect interpretations of weather & climate,=20 which is why forecasting is not so effective. It is now over 2 years since my revelations concerning Newton's Opticks=20 errors and I have repeatedly requested from the RIA an Open Meeting to=20 present these findings, as the Royal/Customer Charter provides - this=20 request has been hostilely denied. Children, right now, are wrongly=20 being educated with defective science. However the President Luke Drury=20 (LD) eventually agreed to a private meeting on May 9 last. Being a=20 private meeting I was restrained from reporting fully on the events but=20 was able to report points of fact - which I did the following day.=20 However, the circumstances which were causal of this claim now releases=20 me from such restraint. It is important to recognise that LD is a theoretical (not an=20 experimental) astro-physicist and that my R&D into Newton's opticks has=20 essentially proved much of LD's life's work to be incorrect, as with=20 Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins and with the IPCC & Mary Robinson in=20 relation to climate change, and with science academia in general. My R&D=20 has completely transformed the generally long-held view of how the=20 Universe & World functions in its (near) most fundamental manner. It is understandable, as I full well know as an engineer, the gut wrench=20 when one discovers that one has been wrong in any particular=20 project/task - but professionalism compels acceptance & meticulous=20 correction of the error; and not to sweep it out of sight. The same cannot be said of scientists who do not operate under statutory=20 regulated professional body as such (or as to the best of my knowledge) As a consequence of my R&D disproving Newton, LD has become increasingly=20 hostile; during the private meeting it took much of the time cajoling=20 him into actually observing through a prism to which he repeatedly fell=20 back to repeating incorrect theories; but it was when the sun came out=20 briefly, even though weakly, that I could demonstrate with sunlight that=20 Newton WAS wrong - at that point of realisation LD became extremely=20 agitated & angry and kept insisting I leave the academy house, which I=20 did whilst trying to reason with him en route to the exit. RIA security=20 cameras can verify this. The hostility from LD has not diminished despite my numerous attempts to=20 keep matters on a constructive path; the RIA Council also do not respond=20 to my communications as is required of them - this is in direct breach=20 of the Royal Charter & new Customer Charter. I also point out that academia in general is held subservient to the=20 governance violations/abuses by the RIA. R&D grants are won or lost=20 based upon academics toeing the RIA's 'line'. Oppose, and grants are=20 cut-off/not awarded. This is a gross abuse & explains why academics=20 produce 'science' works that conform to the needs of corporates, which=20 becomes Organised Crime, and explains why science has gone far-off track=20 into science fiction, both physics & especially economics. Corporate Organised Crime, and hence oppressive & destructive Economy=20 Terrorism, occurs partly because Grants are not being correctly=20 distributed on Merit grounds. A particular RIA event occurred in a Trinity College auditorium a few=20 year ago - a Nobel Prize scientist was lecturing with an Irish Times=20 reporter acting as Chair - I raised objections to the reporter, being an=20 unqualified person, acting as Chair of a science lecture - the reporter=20 made many incorrect science statements - yet, not one of the numerous=20 senior science academics in attendance dared to challenge RIA's gross=20 Governance violation - because of fear of reprisals. The public are largely misinformed by 'science' reporters, who are=20 unqualified, who in turn are being misinformed by unregulated=20 'scientists', and who hostilely refuse to accept that Newton's opticks=20 are wrong. BBC regularly present 'science' programmes presented by unqualified,=20 unregulated persons. Of note is a recent series presented by Marcus du=20 Sautoy, whom I keep regularly informed of my R&D. On Monday June 24 BBC4=20 aired a new 2013 programme: Precision: The Measure of all Things. Du=20 Sautoy falsely presented disproved 'science' pertaining to Newton's=20 Opticks - including omitting evidence on a sketch diagram that proved=20 ownership of IP to another unknown person. Later in the programme he=20 presented personnel from UK's National Physical Laboratory who=20 reinforced incorrect interpretations of light stemming from errors in=20 opticks stemming from Newton's dishonesty. The evidence of opticks errors have been presented to RIA President Luke=20 Drury but he is in hostile denial, and he & RIA Council, and other=20 academic institutions, refuse an Open Meeting to air the proofs of my=20 R&D that disproves 350 years of incorrect opticks. There are many other important points to consider, some of which are: - that the majority of RIA members are academics funded by taxpayers'=20 money - this means our money is being used by RIA to entrench Organised=20 Crime which works against us, hence economic turmoil. - ex-President Mary Robinson's Climate Justice is supported by Richard=20 Branson a corporate criminal that has built his business through=20 defrauded employee pensions & other scams. (Note: I have for long &=20 regularly kept Branson informed of these facts, he has chosen not to=20 challenge me, because these statements are true & proofs are available -=20 Branson has accepted these truths, hence no one else can claim the=20 statements are abusive or defamatory. The fact that Justice/Police do=20 not investigate & prosecute Branson is proof of breakdown in Justice system= ) - the RIA's Customer Charter was unilaterally imposed upon the people,=20 the Public had no inputs into its establishment - which is a governance=20 violation. Consequently any interpretation of the Charter must be such=20 that the Customer receives full benefit of any doubt as to=20 interpretations, or of any Rights violations. - the fact that RIA are actively assisting corporates with defective=20 academic models, which is the means by which Organised Crime is=20 legitimised, and that Justices are members of the RIA, is what causes=20 the Justice System to be undermined. - RIA fail to display Minutes of General & other Meetings on their=20 website, and the contents of minutes are totally inadequate & with=20 relevant issues purposefully omitted. - Conferences, seminars, discourses from RIA are essentially 'one-way'=20 communications; any attempt to counter defective points is cut-short &=20 interaction limited to questions, which wrongly assumes that what went=20 before justifies a question rather than, and often, a rebuttal. At one General Meeting I raised a 'point-of-order' concerning some of=20 the above points but was immediately abusively shouted down by LD & with=20 one or two hecklers in support. This confirms that the RIA has no=20 intention of fulfilling its Customer/Royal Charter obligations of=20 engaging with the public, or of transparently keeping the public=20 correctly informed, or of achieving excellence in the sciences &=20 humanities. The purpose of these obstructions to valid objections being=20 simply to maintain defective science giving false credibility to=20 corporate Organised Crime. And how better to do it, than having Justices on board! Another crucial factor behind RIA's Governance violations is the failure=20 of the Comptroller & Auditor General fulfilling its duties in auditing=20 the RIA. [From Comptroller & Auditor General website: 'Mission To provide independent assurance that public money is properly managed=20 and spent to good effect and to contribute to improvements in public=20 administration The role of the Office is to * audit and report on the accounts of public bodies * establish that transactions of public bodies are in accordance with the legal authorities governing them and that funds are applied for the purposes intended * provide assurance on the system of internal financial control put in place by each body * examine whether each body administers its resources economically and efficiently and has mechanisms in place to evaluate the effectiveness of operations * authorise the release of funds from the Exchequer for purposes permitted by law In implementing this mandate account is taken of the special=20 considerations which attach to the management of public funds including=20 the requirements of probity and sound corporate governance'] The C&AG does not audit the award of funds for research & development,=20 or of RIA's general operations. The term 'probity' does not feature in=20 the functioning of the RIA because C&AG does not compel such compliance=20 - 'probity' is that all encompassing term that closes any & all=20 loopholes for those intent on governance violations. It is because probity is absent that RIA can shout down legitimate=20 opposition & objections, call on police & Justices to maintain=20 governance violations -> and hence R&D is grossly skewed to maintaining=20 corporate Organised Crime. Governments are strongly influenced by academic 'science' models, with=20 much influence from RIA, which impact on government policies & law,=20 which then skew economies detrimentally, resulting in protests.=20 Governments can simply claim they are following 'Best Advice/Practice',=20 yet government/s know that RIA, hence academia, do not comply with=20 Governance, which is why RIA can produce defective 'science' models. This Court should not attribute any significance to the fact that two=20 Justices, including Chief Justice, are members of the RIA. Outside of=20 their Offices they are no different to any other persons, entitled to no=20 especial privileges other than allowed for through legitimate=20 remunerations & protections, are bound by court orders, including those=20 from this Small Claim Court. Therefore this Court must not be swayed=20 into thinking that some members of RIA being Justices gives credibility=20 to the RIA. The numerous governance violations confirms RIA's lack of=20 credibility. The RIA have for long been in gross violation of even the most basic of=20 Governance Principles - hence RIA do NOT purse Excellence. The RIA's position over my R&D that disproves Newton's Opticks is not=20 dissimilar to flat-earth thinkers oppressively opposing (then, centuries=20 ago) new science that showed the world round. Whether the Court agrees or disagrees with my R&D results is IMMATERIAL=20 to the fact that the RIA has CONTRACTUALLY failed to address the issues=20 in an appropriate forum, and allowing me to interact with Academic=20 Freedom - this contractual failure by RIA is the cause of the claim herein. The contractual failure is also the governance failure. (I also point out that Ireland's communications infrastructure is=20 compromised by USA & UK invasion - the recent revelations in the media=20 concerning Edward Snowden's release of information concerning USA & UK=20 spying, is also affecting Ireland. Both UPC.ie & Eircom.ie are=20 unlawfully destroying/blocking state communications. Both UPC & Eircom are owned & controlled by USA ISPs that are destroying=20 and/or spying on sovereign state & other legitimate communications &=20 websites. Due to my R&D Eircom have recently changed their corporate=20 structure - Eircom have consumed my IP without payment. Garda (Police) Commissioner refuses to uphold the law and hence refuses=20 to act - in fact he now blocks my email address; the Chief Justice=20 refuses to uphold the Constitution and hence refuses to act) *RIA's Customer Charter* (appended below) NOTES: - The term 'general public' means the private persons individually=20 aggregated into the collective 'public' - the term 'use' means to 'consume' Consequently the intended purpose of the RIA's Charter is a contract=20 which meets the requirements for a Small Claim, vis: 'a claim in respect=20 of goods or services bought for private use from someone selling them in=20 the course of a business (consumer claim)' Governance failures/abuses by RIA incur property damage. - RIA wrongly mixes stakeholders with customers - RIA wrongly gives its Academy members priority over the general public - RIA opposes achievements in learning by denying Newton was wrong *Particulars of Claim* On Friday June 14, 2013 the RIA held a long advertised (more than 12=20 months) Discourse by Royal Society President Paul Nurse (see email=20 attached below). By error I had made two bookings on different dates=20 hence had reserved 2 seats. On arrival at the RIA Academy House I was confronted by staff with a=20 names list, it transpired that my name was not on the list despite=20 having made 2 bookings. It quickly became clear that the RIA had purposefully changed the title=20 of the discourse & hence now stated that the tickets I held were for a=20 cancelled event & that the current evening's event was entirely=20 different. I pointed out that no notice of cancellation had been sent=20 out, that the current event was the same venue as the booked event, on=20 the same date, at the same time, by the same person - and that the ONLY=20 difference was the title of the discourse, which change of title has=20 occurred in other discourses before at the RIA but without rebooking=20 necessary. (Old Title: Great Ideas of Biology; New Title: Making Science Work) Another female member stated that I could not go in because of Health &=20 Safety reasons - the mind boggles that Ireland can be held enslaved to=20 such feeble arguments; 'health & safety' is often used as the first line=20 of opposition so as to not do anything. I had to side-step Pauric Dempsey (PD, who has previously without any=20 cause physically assaulted & orally insulted me) to speak to Luke Drury=20 - it quickly became clear that LD's unwarranted anger, over my R&D=20 having destroyed long-held science theories & much of LD's science=20 works, was still seething within LD. LD stated that I was abusive to the=20 Academy in having insulted the Chief Justice Susan Denham. I pointed out=20 that I was simply making a valid/lawful (political) statement (that the=20 Chief Justice had undermined the Judiciary & its Impartiality by=20 accepting membership of the RIA which did not uphold Honesty), and=20 politely so. On the grounds LD had stated, he demanded that I leave the Academy - it=20 was clear then that this was the true & only reason behind the devious=20 concoction of changing the name of the discourse - so as to deny me=20 access, to deny Academic Freedom, and by devious manipulations. (This is not dissimilar to a patient thumping a doctor for breaking bad=20 news to the patient) I pointed out again that I had made a booking (x2) & showed him the=20 print out of the email (below), that no notice of cancellation of the=20 other discourses had been sent out. LD restated PD's statement that it=20 was a different event. I reiterated that no notice of cancellation had been sent out, that the=20 current event was the same venue as the booked event, on the same date,=20 at the same time, by the same person - and that the ONLY difference was=20 the title of the discourse, which change of title has occurred in other=20 discourses before at the RIA but without rebooking necessary. It was clear LD's bravado had increased a number of clicks now that he=20 had bought on board Chief Justice Susan Denham as a member of the RIA,=20 to join another member, Supreme Court Justice, Adrian Hardiman. LD demanded I leave; I stated again that I had a valid booking & that=20 there were always plenty of seats available (by 18h00 start there were=20 still plenty available) - LD stated that he would call the police=20 (garda); I said that was fine, this because we needed to establish the=20 extent to which the RIA can & will abusively call upon State Authority=20 to entrench the RIA's dishonesty & undermine Academic Freedom. (It is interesting to note that on Monday June 10, 4 days prior, the RIA=20 held a Seminar: Values in University Education: From Academic Freedom to=20 Impact; David Puttnam (UK, House of Lords & Open University Chancellor)=20 also presented by weblink. In the seminar it was pointed out that London School of Economics had=20 recently pulled one of their conferences in the middle-east (Bahrain?)=20 because of government interference with speakers (but now RIA was=20 prepared to destroy Academic Freedom) I raised to Puttnam that the RIA was in hostile denial over my having=20 disproved Newton's Opticks - of which Puttnam is fully aware as I keep=20 him & Parliament informed of my Professional Engineering R&D; Puttnam=20 went off on a tangent about Ove Arup engineers and purposefully=20 avoided/evaded addressing the issue) After some 15 minutes 2 police constables arrived (B480 John Starkey &=20 B471 Kenneth? Clince). I pointed out the issues but the police were not=20 prepared to protect against UDHR & Constitutional abuses by the RIA -=20 and, despite my warning that they were abusing their powers and=20 corrupting Academic Freedom (or to effect), the police warned that if I=20 did not leave then I was trespassing - it was clear the police were=20 prepared not to uphold Rights. I restated that there were plenty seats available and insisted that they=20 view the evidence for themselves - they refused to verify the evidence.=20 I took their names & left Shortly after, outside, constable JS took my details in his notebook,=20 more a scrap-book. From what I had learnt on a South African Police=20 Reserve training programme years ago -> notebooks had to be meticulously=20 filled-in, no gaps betweens entries, entries lined-off, no missing=20 pages, etc. JS's scrap-book falls far short of professionalism. BUT, this is not to blame JS, but to blame the generally corrupt nature=20 of Ireland's Police executive, as often stated by the media, headed by=20 Commissioner Martin Callinan & Judiciary headed by Denham, who both=20 continue undermining, as did their predecessors, according to media=20 reports. This is not dissimilar to the status in UK, USA, SA & around=20 the world. NOTE:- global corporate Organised Crime could not be=20 entrenched even if only one Justice System stood up to global corporate=20 crooks. It is stressed that both JS & KC were polite, but both refused to uphold=20 Rights. It is beyond all comprehension that Luke Drury & Paul Nurse could=20 corrupt themselves to undermine Academic Freedom and to call upon State=20 Authority to act as thugs; and beyond comprehension that Susan Denham &=20 Adrian Hardiman can undermine themselves and the Judiciary & Justice=20 System by joining a generally dishonest, immoral Academy. My R&D as a Professional Engineer has been, partly, to establish the=20 Causal Links that have created an unstable Global Economy; to identify=20 principally the dynamics and, consequently, the key personas, natural &=20 juristic, that are scheming the scams that collectively make up global=20 corporate Organised Crime. It is this collective corporate Organised Crime that imposes Economy=20 Terrorism upon the World; which drives impoverishment, enslavement=20 (including forcing women into sexual prostitution) & is causal of=20 socio-economic upheaval that erupts into civil war - as we see in the=20 middle-east. Peace initiatives cannot be sustained because the underlying economic=20 models are the very cause of destabilisation. The professional/academic dereliction, governance violations, by Luke=20 Drury, Paul Nurse, Susan Denham, Adrian Hardiman, are part contributory=20 to global Organised Crime. RIA have failed to fulfil its Royal Charter; its Customer charter; its=20 Mission Statement, Customer Service Statement, General Customer Care=20 statement & its Complaints procedures - all of which falls under the=20 general term of Governance. The nature of this claim is:- to compel Governance compliance by RIA, a=20 small-claim is a simple means for attaining enforced compliance, for=20 compensation for wastage/loss/damage of Intellectual Property reflected=20 in the time-damage/loss of same, and all due to RIA's Governance & Contractual violations through its=20 abusive actions. *Claim: * 1. To direct the RIA to contractually comply with its Customer Charter/Royal Charter and fully comply with all reasonable Governance requirements 2. To direct the RIA to contractually comply with its Customer Charter/Royal Charter and to promptly hold an Open Meeting to hear & consider my evidence concerning Newton's Opticks errors. 3. To direct the RIA to contractually comply with its Customer Charter/Royal Charter and to cease & desist from any further attacks, insults or unwarranted obstructions against me 4. To direct the RIA to pay wasted time-costs due to access denial to June 14 Discourse of (6 hours x E324.00) + E25.00 =3D E1969.00 (One Thousand Nine Hundred & Sixty Nine Euros) 1. (2 hours preparation, 1.5 hours travel, 2.5 hours of lost work-time due to distractions of RIA abuses =3D 6 hours) 2. Reiterate: this is not a penalty but simply a correct (part) award of a Research Grant that should have been awarded by RIA had Merit been correctly applied to adjudication of my R&D. 3. Based upon Engineers Ireland generally accepted professional/chartered engineer rates of 18c/hour per E100 of gross annual salary of a mid-career Chartered/Professional Engineer at E60,000 Gross =3D E108.00 per hour (One Hundred & Eight Euros per hour) 4. BUT, I point out that I am a senior Professional Engineer in qualifications & experience, that my professional R&D is at the forefront of pioneering new sciences (Physics & Economics) that disproves centuries-long-standing theories & progresses science into new correct directions; therefore I contend that the hourly rate of E108.00 does not reflect the seniority or standard of my work-time; and that a factor of 3 would be more appropriate even though still not reflecting the true higher value of my work-time =3D> E324.00 peer hour. I point out that the value of my R&D to Ireland alone far exceeds 100 Billion Euros, globally the value runs into the Trillions - I can provide evidence of my professional work to prove my claims) 5. Due to the fact that governments have not paid me for my R&D AND because corporates are openly hostile to me, I have not been properly paid for some ten years, consequently I am unable to afford the fee for this application & request condonation for same. Sincerely Chris Addington Pr.Eng. cdadd2@gmail.com, cdadd3@eircom.net, +353 (0)86 168 4318 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: =09 Royal Irish Academy Event Date: =09 22 Jan 2013 14:48:00 +0000 From: =09 no-reply@ria.ie To: =09 cdadd Event: Academy Discourse: Great Ideas of Biology Date of Registration: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 Venue: Belfast/Dublin - Venue TBC Date: 13th/14th June 2013, 6 pm Thank you for registering for Academy Discourse: Great Ideas of Biology,=20 you have booked 2 tickets. Please print this email to use as your ticket. Please do not reply directly to this email. All queries should be sent=20 to events@ria.ie RIA website: Academy Discourse: Making Science Work Sir Paul Nurse, will give a discourse on Making Science Work at The=20 Great Hall, Queen's University Belfast and Academy House, Dublin on 13=20 and 14 June. More Details. *ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY* *CUSTOMER CHARTER* *Mission Statement* The Royal Irish Academy (RIA), the academy for the sciences and=20 humanities for the whole of Ireland, will vigorously promote excellence in scholarship,=20 recognise achievements in learning, and undertake its own research project,=20 particularly in areas relating to Ireland and its heritage. It will reflect upon, advise=20 on and contribute to public debate and public policy formation on issues of major interest=20 in science, technology and culture. It will continue to offer an independent forum=20 to Irish scholars, it will provide a network of support for scholarly disciplines=20 through its network of academic committees and commissions, it will maintain and=20 enhance its unique library, it will publish scholarly papers and it will represent=20 the world of Irish learning internationally. *Customer Service Statement* The Academy is fully committed to the pursuit of excellence in all=20 aspects of its service to its stakeholders and customers, both external and internal.=20 We will seek to ensure that this commitment is met at all times by using our resources=20 in an efficient and effective way. Our stakeholders/customers consist of the Academy's Members, the wider=20 academic community, members of our specialist academic committees, users of our=20 Library, the general public, the Higher Education Authority, relevant government departments, and, internally, the Academy's staff. *General Customer Care* The Academy is committed to providing its services in a professional,=20 considerate, courteous and open manner. We will be sensitive to our customers'=20 particular needs and circumstances and respect their rights under equality and other=20 legislation. The Academy is committed to delivering a high-level quality service. The Academy is committed to providing equality of treatment The Academy is committed to the principles of modernisation and flexibility in its work=20 practices. It will take all necessary steps available to it to achieve greater efficiency=20 and effectiveness in the provision of its services. Staff members will respond to communications, whether by letter, email,=20 phone-call or fax, promptly and courteously. Every effort will be made to provide=20 substantive responses within a reasonable timeframe to queries from stakeholders and customers. We will continue to expand and develop our web site and to maximise the=20 electronic availability of information, and publications. We are committed to the use of up-to-date modern technology so that our=20 services continue to maintain a high technical standard. We will continue to take steps towards full implementation of the=20 relevant provisions of the Official Languages Act 2003. We will endeavour to develop and maintain good internal communications=20 so that there is an integrated approach to serving our customers/stakeholders in=20 a prompt and responsive way. We will continue to ensure that all Academy publications are of the=20 highest quality in content, style and presentation. Academy House, 19 Dawson Street, Dublin 2, is the main centre of the=20 Academy's activities, hosting many conferences, symposia etc. The Academy's=20 Library, with its highly significant manuscript collection, is located there also.=20 Physical access to Academy House for persons with impaired mobility is limited because of=20 the physical structure of the 18th century building. A ramp and invalid chair have=20 been installed in Academy House in recent years, so facilitating persons with physical=20 disability to enter both the lower ground and ground floors of Academy House. In=20 effect, this means that such persons can attend functions in the Academy's public=20 rooms and use the Academy's Library facilities. *Complaints* If a person is dissatisfied with the standard of service received,=20 she/he may contact the relevant head of the section concerned who will investigate the=20 matter. The outcome of the investigation will be reviewed by the Executive Secretary=20 who will issue a written response to the person who made the complaint. All such=20 reviews will take cognisance of existing laws, rules, practice or policy of the=20 Academy or the generally accepted principles of equity and good administrative practice. *How to contact the Academy:* The Royal Irish Academy 19 Dawson Street Dublin 2. Telephone: 01 6762570 Fax: 01 6762346 Email: info@ria.ie Web site: www.ria.ie --=20 Chris Addington Pr.Eng. --------------090406070409090209000607 Content-Type: text/html; charset="WINDOWS-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20

= INDEX:

= - RIA Discourse - Torture, Terrorism & Memory

= - Justice, Revenge, Terrorism; What is Which & Which is What<= /p>

= -Who's Terrorising Who

= - Small Claim Court Dublin: Chris Addington vs Royal Irish Academy

= RIA Discourse Wednesday June 26, 2013 18h00

= Torture, Terrorism & Memory

Pro= fessors:

Ric= hard English (St Andrews, rle2@st-andrews.ac.uk) &

Sha= ne O'Mara (TCD, smomara@tcd.ie)

= Reply: Adrian Hardiman

The joint Discourse was interesting & informative not only for presenting an overview of physical & psychological damage that can occur within human-brains from torture & terrorism (Shane O'Mara), but also for highlighting the false 'political correctness' in the the historical & political developments, especially post 9/11 (Richard English)

(RI= A should be putting slides & recording onto their website - viewing is recommended)

The falsities were reinforced by RIA President Luke Drury's continued suppression of truths & Academic Freedom - by his ignoring of raised hands in question time.

Wha= t was also glaringly evaded, was the distinction between Terrorist & Freedom-Fighter - this was totally ignored, by both presenters and by Adrian Hardiman, a Supreme Court Judge. The concept of western Economy Terrorism was also ignored.

Fal= se 'Political Correctness' was, overarchingly, the implied theme - and it was a great pity that O'Mara's presentation should have been tainted with the false 'political correctness' of English=92s presentation & Hardiman's reply.

Whi= lst the presentation by Shane O'Mara was interesting (& unsettling) insofar as the technical aspects of torture & terrorism, it was clear that ideology, as presented by Richard English, has become rutted since 9/11, and maintaining George Bush's warped interpretations of Justice, Revenge & Terrorism of almost 11 years ago (see below).

The truth about 'Who's Terrorising Who' (also see below) remains entrapped in political correctness, and Hardiman's reply confirmed the Judiciary's ploys in maintaining this incorrect 'correctness'. (The papers below were developed prior to understandings of the Twin Towers having been imploded, and long prior to torontohearings.org, which was justified by CDADD's definitive proof of implosions, vis: absence of transfer-of-momentum dynamics for a natural collapse, consequently additional high-impulse, explosive, forces were present, and sequentially, which by definition is an implosion)

Ric= hard English assisted in the peace settlement in Northern Ireland, but this was a politically correct settlement not a grass-roots solution - which is why conflict is continuing/increasing. The same is happening elsewheres in the world & with Russia becoming increasingly polarised.

Ter= rorism is long-term torture maintaining memories - which is why NI, Afghanistan, Syria, Egypt, Libya are constantly on the boil - but the causal terrorism is the West's Economy Terrorism, those oppressed are merely fighting for valid freedoms.

The turmoil in Egypt with public protest calls for President Morsi's resignation & with Military undertones added to the noise (& Morsi now having been ousted), ignores the realities that it doesn=92t matter who is in power, that the person in power has no hope of defeating the west's oppressive Economy Terrorism - except by engaging Economy Engineering.

Egy= pt's turmoil exists BECAUSE Morsi could not solve the economic problems, BECAUSE no one can whilst the West impose oppressive Economy Terrorism - except by engaging Economy Engineering.

Tur= moil will continue until such time as; a new dictator takes control - and one that is pleasing to the USA; or some sense comes into play.

Whe= ther that dictator comes about through 'democratic' manipulations as occurred in Russia or through armed onslaught as occurs in Syria is immaterial to the fact that 'peace' & 'stability' will only come about when the USA are pleased.

The West, especially the USA, are purposefully wanting economic instability, because it means they can control & take resources as they demand.

Pol= itical Correctness does not/cannot bring Grass-Roots Solutions - only Economy Engineering will achieve this

RIA President Luke Drury referred (to effect) to the mergement of the sciences with the humanities; but those in the humanities merely assume (wrongly so) that those in the sciences are telling the truth regarding their science theories -> BUT, we know that Luke Drury & RIA & academia are not honest about this.

And this was abundantly clear when I asked Richard English (after closure, because Luke Drury purposefully ignored my raised hand) why he had ignored that the Twin Towers were imploded - English replied that that was nonsense - I pressed him on this but after a few invalid comments he went off in a huff to huddle with Luke Drury, Adrian Hardiman & a few others, whose seething hostilities against me could be cut with a knife.

Ric= hard English is an historian closed-minded to science evidence, and readily open to popular sci-fi beliefs - which makes his analyses unsound. English was influential, even though unqualified, in Tony Blair=92s NI initiatives, it part-explains why Blair was misled into political correctness rather than grass-roots solutions; and why Blair is having little if any impact in the Middle East.

Ric= hard English is also a member of the RIA.

Eng= lish gave further distortions through emotive disparities; such as referring to the Guildford IRA no-warning bombing, yet not referring to the no-warning Brit Army attacks on IRA & NI people. (We can readily see the continuing disparities today with the recent exposure of far less rigour being applied to the investigations of murders by Brit Army compared to those by the IRA.

Ric= hard English's presentation was fraught with unqualified assumptions & emotive distortions, creating a heavily skewed picture far from the truth.

Sha= ne O'Mara mainly kept to science facts, as obtained by his research, and was convincing in his presentation; in stark contrast to that by Richard English

In Reply: Hardiman's reference to Ireland's standpoint toward political refugees belies the fact that Ireland is now fully complicit in Economy Terrorism causal of the oppressions that drives people to seek political asylum. Hardiman's refusal, as a Supreme Court Judge, to uphold Ireland=92s Constitution & to bring honesty into the RIA is contributory to the cancerous spread of purposefully defective 'science' models that maintain corporate Organised Crime that manifests as Economy Terrorism and enforced by immoral Military Might; and which maintains incorrect history.

The issues of Edward Snowden & Julian Assange highlights the manner in which 'political asylum' is wrongly meant to mean 'political imprisonment'.

Ecu= ador was totally wrong to impose political silence upon Assange, and to refuse (delay?) Snowden asylum, simply because they pursue political freedom & expression.

Pre= sident Putin was wrong to impose conditions tantamount to political imprisonment upon Snowden's political asylum application.

The USA's argument that Snowden is a traitor is pure nonsense - tantamount to arguing that an Auschwitz guard would have been a traitor for revealing the truth.

Whi= stle-blowing of Human Rights Violations is not traitorous, even the USA's outdated Constitution recognises the obligations of upholding Rights, by all.

Pre= sident Obama is being entirely disingenuous by keeping distance from these events - it is he that can & should & must ensure Rights protections.

USA has not ratified its signature to the Rome Statute & UDHR; that alone is a compelling reason for all signatory nations to offer asylum.

Whe= ther a Roman Emperor compelling conflict within a closed Coliseum; or a Nazi guard compelling ingestion of Zyklon-B within a closed 'shower', or a President compelling civil conflict through oppressive socio-economic disparities -> the effects are identical -> Genocide.

The real difference being that modern day Presidents achieve a far, far, far more efficient kill-rate (with the assistance of compliant Chief Justices).

The increasing polarisation between West & East, driven by the West's Economy Terrorism, is abundantly clear as further demonstrated by the recent Taliban attack on the Afghan Presidential compound, CIA base & various surrounding embassies. And this attack after President Obama promoted talks with the Taliban.

Pol= itical Correctness will not bring grass-roots solutions.

Ter= rorism is long-term torture maintaining memories, caused by the West, and with the full complicity of abusive, dishonest Powers that lack Authority within Academia -> producing reactionary freedom fighting (wrongly tagged as fundamentalist terrorism)

Lis= ten to the RIA recordings & view the slides but keep perspective over the gross distortions (www.ria.ie)

Sin= cerely

Chr= is Addington Pr.Eng.

Justice, Revenge, Terroris= m

What is Which &am= p; Which is What


Colesberg (SA) lies almost equidistant between Johannesburg and Cape Town on National Route 1 in the stark but beautiful Karoo landscape. The typical flat-topped karoo koppie of Cole=92s kop, a British Gun position in the Boer War, stands out as singularly attractive amongst the landscape.

On Monday July 8, 2002 at approximately 22h40 whilst Colesberg sheepshearers slumbered(?) on a cold wintry night CNN beamed to Colesberg, amongst other global points, President Bush at a White House media briefing and Q&A session.


During his discourse Bush used the words =93Justice=94 and =93Revenge= =94 and shortly thereafter =93Terrorism=94.

Exhaustion, from a night drive to Colesberg along a road-worked black ribbon =93highway=94, was suddenly broken not so much by the words but more by the unconvincing manner in which the words were used. It was clear that Bush did not understand the meanings of the words he was using; and more importantly he put across that the import of =93terrorism=94 was that of somebody attacking the United States or its peoples. Clear misunderstanding.


So what do these words mean, practically. The dictionary does not give practical insight merely academic qualification.


Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary states:


  • Justice =96 the quality of being just: integrity, impartiality, rightness, the awarding of what is due: a judge, a magistrate.


  • Revenge =96 to inflict injury in retribution, to avenge, an act of inflicting a malicious injury in return for injury received: the desire for retaliation of evil.


  • Terrorism =96 an organised system of intimidation, to create extreme fear.


The context of Bushes statements were in regard to Osama and his objective of =93getting=94 him.

Depending on which side of the fence one is sitting determines the interpretation & application of each of these 3 words.

To Osama Sept 11 was possibly revenge for US=92s ongoing aggression (terrorism) - either directly by US=92s own military intervention, or indirectly by supplies of mass destruction war-weapons to other parties.

To Bush Sept 11 was possibly terrorism by a fundamentalist who had total disregard for justice.


But Osama, like everyone else, could not access the kind of justice that Bush interprets from that word.


There is a need to define in practical terms these words.


As a first pass in attempting to give practical definition:-


Justice: The practical & observable outcomes of an ideal justice system in which on each & every occasion of dispute that the outcome of each dispute is resolved effectively & efficiently, with an optimum determination such that collectively both parties receive optimum satisfaction, and have reached an understanding of & accepted their opponents position, and are able to live in harmony.

The aforegoing can only be achieved if a justice system is open, transparent, accessible, understandable, focused on mediation as a first stage & integral justice process,


Revenge: - a micro act.

Given an ideal Justice System: - an individual exacting revenge against another for injury received without first seeking recourse through the Justice System. Alternatively; not accepting the outcome of an ideal Justice System


Terrorism:- a macro act of revenge by groups of people



But:- there is not one country in the world that has a just Justice System. Consequently outcomes of disputes leave parties in a non-optimal outcome state, and most often a far worse position, thus a party harbours greater resentment & anger, and can choose to exact revenge.

People globally know that justice is not present within Justice Systems therefore the majority do not use the system They either write-off the dispute, or harbour resentment and a revenge attitude.


Historically the per-unit destructive power of one person was relatively small: in increasing order: sticks & stones, metal weapons, bows & arrows.

Then explosives were discovered and the per-unit destructive power took a huge leap with guns & cannons, thus requiring fewer people to effect previous levels of destruction. In under a century the per-unit destructive power has made exponential quantum leaps to date with, progressively:- tanks, planes, missiles-conventional, nuclear, etc..

Twin Towers was a macro-revenge act (terrorism) in which airplanes carrying people were flown & aimed at other people, in revenge for US missiles being flown & aimed at other people.


Both events occurred because of the absence of a global forum that is open, transparent, accessible, understandable, focused on mediation as a first stage & integral justice process, in which people or societies can effectively & efficiently resolve disputes.

But before this can be achieved on a global, macro, scale it is imperative that just Justice Systems are developed first on a micro scale.


Until then it is impossible, because of fence positions, to differentiate between US & Osama (& others) - to determine what is which & which is what


Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

+27 (0)83 962 7098,



Who=92s Terrorising Who


(UPDATE JULY 2013: This paper was developed some 3 years prior to CDADD's proofs of Twin Towers implosions, which justified the Toronto Hearings, torontohearings.org

Vis: absence of transfer-of-momentum dynamics for a natural collapse, consequently additional high-impulse, explosive, forces were present, and sequentially, which by definition is an implosion)


The World Trade Centre & Pentagon attacks were events caused by a micro-subset of the world=92s population which is having macro-global repercussions.


There is really no difference between a missile flown & aimed at a mass of people, and an aircraft containing people being flown & aimed at a target containing other people.


Commonalities between this event and past events need addressing to ensure that effective solutions are found for the future. The intention is not to offend anyone but to determine the truth behind events which are leading to global destabilisation.


Much of the current global conflict is centred around the Middle East and is as a consequence of the aggressive standpoint of Israel combined with USA=92s =91spy versus spy=92 & cloak & dagger political manipulations (coup engineering etc.)


The USA has, since WW1 and more so since WW2, become polarised from the Monroe Doctrine - which was a policy decision not to become embroiled in European/Global issues. The USA has increasingly in the past 5 decades been responsible for manipulating the affairs of other sovereign states for their, the US=92s, perceived benefit.

However in all cases the US=92s manipulations have back fired with huge loss of life and resultant increased complexities in world relations.

Part of the problem that has led to current situations is that there are =93secret=94 (non-transparent) societies/groups that manoeuvre & manipulate into power positions. Whether the power base is political, financial, social, or other, the various groups organise themselves upon cultural or ideological or other lines, and use their collective influence for the benefit of their own limited membership and at the expense of society as a whole. Masons & legal practitioners are examples of such secret societies.

But historically a more powerful group has had long standing influence in world events. For want of a name:- JPP will suffice - Jewish Power Players.


According to the SA Jewish Museum in Cape Town there are 14 Million Jews in the world as of 2000.

Israel 5 Million. US 6 Million, SA 90,000, Europe mainly the balance with small numbers in various countries.


We have seen over the past 5 decades increasing aggressiveness by Israel against its neighbours - immediate & close distanced.

Recent responses to suicide bombers have resulted in disproportionate action by Israel=92s military which is supplied by the USA with powerful hi-tech weapons.


How is it possible that such a minuscule group of people, out of a world population of billions, and who are largely fragmented throughout the world, can cause so much trouble?

It is impossible to correlate a conventional bomb (whether a suicide bomber is attached to it or not) with even one missile from an attack aircraft against an opponent; but this is Israel=92s standard tactic.

It would be unacceptable for Britain to respond with missile attacks to every IRA bomb.

The majority of=92 Jews are faith-loving people =96 they go about their normal daily business as do most people and integrate with society as most social groups do; but a minuscule minority of=92 this minuscule population group engage in Power Playing for their own gain, and at the expense of others, the majority in the world.


The world has been brainwashed into a distorted viewpoint of the holocaust.

A Thumbnail Sketch of the 20th Century (see Historical Archives - brings truth to these distortions) =96 but further issues need to be examined, because a simple statement that Hitler was a monster hides the truth behind the holocaust.


Germany after WW1 was a defeated nation which the Allies continued to humiliate and keep down. The people of Germany were desperate, facing abject poverty, hunger etc.; however these people saw that a certain section of the population were still affluent - the Power Players, and amongst whom many were JPPs - this was where the hate for Jews began to breed.

Just as much as a person denying another water in the middle of a desert creates a life issue, so does denying a nation its dignity create a life issue.

These issues must also be viewed against the horrifying backdrop of WW1.

These people did not have the support that we see today =96 e.g. the families of the victims of the World Trade Centre being counselled to deal with the trauma.

Not only was WWI more than a million-fold more horrific, but there was not the slightest thought of trauma counselling, nor did the Allies assist in re-establishing the fundamentals of human dignity to a defeated nation. In fact they actively kept them down thus breeding intense anger & haired


Consequently people such as Hitler developed intense hatred for the affluent JPPs who were abusing them further. And Hitler was merely the individual who came to the fore, if it had not been him it would have been another person.

It is important to reiterate that the JPPs were a minuscule minority of a minuscule group of people, but their Power base gave them tremendous leverage.


The small but powerful/influential JPPs in the USA have afforded Israel a tremendous Power leverage through financial & armaments support.

The US was therefore part of Israel=92s military machine as a feeder into Israel=92s supply line - in any war supply lines become legitimate targets, as well as the cities & its populations that manufacture the armaments that feed into the supply lines.

So, as much as Berlin & other cities were legitimate WW2 targets, so was the World Trade Centre a legitimate target for Israel=92s opponents (that is not to say that they necessarily committed the act).


What really needs to be addressed is the aggressive Power Playing of Israel that has led to the breeding of intense hatred against Israel & USA & other countries supporting Israel. Blair & Bush=92s stated objectives of targeting bin Laden addresses the people not the problem, which problem they were responsible for in the first instance.


Question:- What changed bin Laden from an acceptable schoolboy (attending a UK school) to a person with such anger against Israel/USA? - the answer to this is a similar answer to the question of: What changed Hitler from a reasonable schoolboy into a hated leader? Answer:- JPPs! NOTE: NOT faith-loving Jews


To argue that Hitler was born a monster raises the potential of babies being 'examined=92 to determine which ones are good and which bad. Manipulation of circumstances are what can lead to anger, the anger is not inherent in people.


It is important to recall:- JPPs are a minuscule number of a minuscule population group


The majority of this minuscule population group are average people who go about their daily business as much as any law abiding person. It is the minuscule number of Power Players that need to be looked at closely; whether they are Power Players in the Social, Financial, Political, Justice or other areas..


London Weekly Telegraph: edition no. 531, Sept/Oct 2001 =97 Pg 34, Obituaries,

S Z Arkoff:- a =93B=94 movie mogul - whose stated rule was:


= =93Once something works, why not milk it dry?=94


Milking something dry carries the full impact of destroying that which others, workers, are trying to build up to ensure security.


On. the micro level, the repercussions of such a policy causes grief for a number of individuals. But these individuals are able to be absorbed into society through, mobility before changing jobs, social security etc. such that the intensity of the grief is reduced.

On the macro level, nations are unable to absorb mass unemployment as a result of nations being milked dry.


Consequently individual grief becomes collective grief which turns to anger.


People become motivated by certain individuals who become their spokespeople & leaders. However those Power Players who are milking them dry are the same ones that have manipulated the =93law= =94 to their favour; thus the leaders acting on behalf of the aggrieved are criminalised and removed from society (this happened to Hitler).

These leaders become increasingly angry, and eventually revenge comes to the fore.

This is why a nation, of which Hitler became the head, was driven by the Allies & JPPs to exact the worst kind of revenge this world has seen to date.


It is therefore crucial that the world is not misled by the import of the phrase =93Rule of Law=94; the Law as we know it has been prostituted by JPPs and other minority Power Player Groups so that the majority are held to ransom.


The world needs to focus on =93Rule of Just Law=94 and a common constitution developed to protect rights. The European Union=92s constitution is a worthless document because of the absence, amongst other issues, of a Bill of Rights.


In South Africa, the world's most advanced Constitution has been emasculated and is essentially worthless as the Legal professionals, a minuscule minority group (of which JPPs comprise a large disproportionate percentage), have retained full justice power for themselves.

Backtracking of the development of the SA Constitution and how the President of the Constitutional Court (later, the first Chief Justice) emasculated it through the manipulating of the Rules of Court can be easily seen.


The Jewish population of SA is around 90.000 (less than half a percent of the total SA population) yet the Constitutional Court has over 30% Jewish representation, clearly a disparity. The High Courts are not much better.

Therefore South Africa is held to ransom by JPPs and other people that have been bought off. Examination of Constitutional Court records will prove that fellow Jewish legal practitioners are protected by these judges - consequently =93Rule of Law=94 in SA is by an effective Judicial Autocracy, through manipulation of the laws to their own benefit, and at the expense of society as a whole.


A visit to the SA Jewish Museum in Cape Town reveals an interesting observation. There is little difference, barring clenched fingers, between Hitler=92s salute and that of the salute of the President of the SA=92s Constitutional Court; the fact that judicial officers feel the need for salutes is a cause for concern in itself. Examination of subsequent events confirm the need for concern.


Are we to endure decades of distorted brainwashing over the WTC issue?

Branding of the perpetrators as evil, lunatic, fundamentalists ignores the disproportionate, fundamentalist standpoint of Israel=92s JPPs who responded with missiles and heavy military hardware to low key conventional bombs.

A person being attached to a bomb doesn=92t change the effect of that bomb, human emotions wrongly elevate the horror and creates further polarisation.


What really needs to be addressed is:- what are the issues that would drive an individual to adopt a suicide attitude?

Answering this brings one back to Power Players manipulating societies such that intense feelings of anger & hatred are created.


The wave of suicide bombings are a recent occurrence, so it would be unreasonable to label the perpetrators of WTC as fundamentally suicidal.

Events drove them to extreme measures, much as war drives any =93normal=94 person to doing things they normally would not do, including actions that would be viewed as suicidal (scrambling out of a WW1 trench directly into a hail of bullets, rescuing wounded from battlefields with bullets & bombs buzzing thickly around, air defence of Malta in WW2 etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.)

The =93suicidal=94 attacks on Israel are little different to these in requiring a mindset shift to carry out the deeds.


There has been a call, since the attacks on the WTC, for a re-examination and improvement of National Psyches - this cannot be achieved until such time as social systems have accessible forums (vis: open accessible courts) for the resolving of disputes, both horizontally and vertically.

Further: to uplift National Psyche it is necessary for governments to act morally in all areas.


The world is accustomed to; wealth being stripped from individuals through immoral taxation to satisfy government greed motives; immorality that is created through closed and inaccessible courts; immoral legislation that ignores true governance but instead focuses on governance through the threat of criminalisation of people.


The fairly recent Microsoft anti-trust issue is a clear case of the USA Power Player=92s view that large money is equal to power. It is inconceivable to suggest that Microsoft were anything but monopolists; yet the Appeal judiciary emasculated years of effort in attempts to protect societies from these practices. But the true failure of the justice system occurred decades ago because the various competitors of Microsoft had no means of opposing MS=92s might in open accessible courts; simply because USA courts (like all other countries) do not have open accessible courts. The MS antitrust case appeal merely confirmed that courts are closed and inaccessible.


There has been a further call for a refocus on Tax Havens that, it is claimed, are allowing terrorists to launder money through confidential accounts. The issue of addressing money-laundering is easily solved by creating a body that can have access to haven accounts but retaining confidentiality for non money-launderers. However the real thrust of the war on tax havens was to attack citizens who had acted reasonably and set up asset protection trusts & businesses in havens.

Threatening Tax Havens (see =93War on Tax Havens=94) will ultimately generate more anger in small island states that are merely having to uplift themselves through fair economic competitive advantage.

How will the pressure from these threats of war be released?


Small, seemingly innocuous, issues can escalate into revenge issues if individuals are deprived.

Individuals have increasingly powerful weapons readily available; thus stable societies are easily open to disruption.


There appears to be two main issues that cause anger within societies to erupt into revenge:_

when have-nots are deprived further of upliftment benefits, or when the rate of achieving upliftment benefits are kept below acceptable levels.

When, hope is destroyed or frustrated.


Perhaps the solution to the Middle East is to create a no-mans land between the parties, much as occurred between Gibraltar & Spain for some 20 or 30 years - to allow emotions to settle Perhaps it would be best to have Jerusalem and other areas fall into a no-mans land. The costs of this would be minimal compared to even one of the airstrikes in Afghanistan


In summary:

There is a clear & urgent need to establish a global sense of =93Rule of Just Law=94.


JPP have been and still are collectively manipulating events in the Middle East, and elsewhere, with the leveraged support of USA=92s military arsenal, with disproportionate responses to conventional retaliatory attacks.


As a minuscule minority of the worlds population JPPs, with leveraged USA military hardware power, are causing a eat deal of trouble.

The USA is an accessory to these acts; and also are directly responsible for their cloak & dagger manipulations.

Collectively they have angered other nations/sects, created despotic puppet governments, all of which is causing global destabilisation.


Immoral government is exacerbating the destruction, or preventing the development, of a positive National/Global Psyche.


Oklahoma City, Dunblane, World Trade Centre are just a few examples that show that individuals & small groups can exact revenge on a massive scale for injustices perpetrated against them.


Who=92s terrorising who??????


Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

CDADD Consulting Services, South Africa

+27 (0)83 962 7098



(UPDATE JULY 2013 - subsequent to this paper CDADD revealed the full extent of Donald Gordon's pensions/investments frauds perpetrated through Liberty Life, and globalised through 'Demutualisation', which caused a progressive & massive flooding of Money Base & Supply with artificial/counterfeit money, which when collapsed c2008 caused the global economy meltdown. It was through these fraudulent monies that Israel was funded to maintain its war-footing)



Ireland Small Claims Court

D= ublin

= Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

= versus

= Royal Irish Academy (RIA)


= AND TO:

= AFFECTED PARTIES:

= Taoiseach (PM)

= Tanaiste (DPM)

= Chief Justice

= Garda (Police) Commissioner

= Comptroller & Auditor General

= & INTERESTED PARTIES (including those of the General Public)

= June 15 to 25, 2013



(To Small-Claim Court:
1. please see under section Claim: Point 4.5
2. Application cover-sheet under separate email)


INDEX:

= - Preamble

= - Background

= - RIA's Customer Charter

= - Specifics of Claim

= - Claim

= Preamble:

I, = the undersigned Christopher David Addington, am a Professional Engineer (equivalent Chartered Engineer)

I point out that every statement herein can be concretely proved to Court, but avoid submitting such proofs herein as they are extremely numerous & each lengthy. Consequently I set out matters in brief. If RIA should challenge then proofs will be submitted.

[Fr= om Court information:

'The small claims procedure is limited to:

  • a claim in respec= t of goods or services bought for private use from someone selling them in the course of a business (consumer claim).

  • a claim in respec= t of minor damage to property (but excluding personal injuries).

  • a claim in respect of the non-return of a rent deposit in relation to a holiday premises (actions relating to rent deposits for places of residence must be brought to the Private Residential Tenancies Board.)

Excluded from the small claims procedure are claims for:

  1. a hire-purchase agreement

  2. a breach of leasing agreement

  3. debts

  4. personal injuries]

A small claim may arise from sale/purchase of goods/service for private use, or for minor property damage. Consumer is synonymous with Customer.

Thi= s application concerns services provided by RIA as per their Customer Charter/Contract, purchased with public/taxpayer funds that for centuries has justified its very existence, which funds accrue from private persons taxed so as to provide beneficial services to all, and for consumption/use of same by private & public.

A contractual failure, governance failure, will ALWAYS cause consequent damage to property both private & public.

It would be a bizarre situation if a minor damage small claim was rejected simply because RIA could argue that they have done far greater damage publicly therefore any one private small claim is invalid within this Court because the aggregate exceeds the small claim limit.

Sim= ilarly: RIA provide services to public & private persons as Customer/s via its Customer/Royal Charter (see Customer Charter appended below; RIA have disingenuously removed the Royal Charter from their website (so it appears)- it would be bizarre to argue that the goods were not actually bought directly by any one individual but via public taxpayer funds, or to argue that service is not solely for private personal consumption and aggregated into public consumption; hence for RIA to wrongly argue it falls outside of a small claim.

Sin= ce Governance violations ALWAYS incur property damage, and first on a micro/small scale, later aggregating to macro-scale; it follows that governance failures must be addressed promptly and before significant property damage increases, it follows that governance violations fall within the ambit of small claims. Even the threat of a governance violation incurring consequent property damage justifies a small claim application.

The nature of this claim should be viewed in its correct light - that this Court simply imposes, partly, an outcome that would have been the case had the RIA correctly fulfilled its Governance obligations as per its Charter/Contract- consequently this Claim should not be seen as a penalty but simply an enforcement of what should have transpired in the first instance.

= This Court should also recognise the global implications of this matter, and of Governance failures in general:

- = the demonstrations against G8 currently (June 15) taking place outside Dublin=92s Garden of Remembrance (& elsewheres) & the various & numerous conflicts around the world such as Syria, Libya, Egypt, the Global Economy Meltdown, etc., etc. - that these upheavals stem from economic instability which derives from global corporate Organised Crime that emanates as oppressive Economy Terrorism - which corporate abuses are made possible by the applications of grossly defective & hence massively destructive academic 'science' (physics & economics) models - which 'science' models give false credibility to otherwise fraudulent corporate scams - which scams have over some 5 to 6 decades artificially inflated global Money Base & Supply with artificial/counterfeit money - which artificial money has grossly skewed economies destructively - which destruction produces the anger & violence that we presently observe - and which Tsunami backwash from collapsed Money Base & Supply has caused the Global Economy Meltdown - and the consequent opposition we observe in the Garden of Remembrance & elsewheres & the understandable armed violence in opposition to Economy Terrorism in the middle-east.

The most notable of these defective economics models can be viewed at Nobel Prize website - I point out that John Nash is the only Nobel Prize winner to make a retraction (admittedly only partial) of his models due to my R&D that disproved its validity.

Sig= nificant Causal Dynamics within my R&D has been adjudicated by a Central Bank Governor & 2 other eminent persons (proofs of same are available).

The polarisation between Vladimir Putin and other key G7's (Barack Obama, David Cameron most notably) stems directly from the economic turmoil created by oppressive western economic models utilised within Russia post-Wall collapse. Putin recognises that the West's economic models do not work, other than impose Economy Terrorism upon others, including Russia; it leaves opposition as the only option available to Putin (& Syria) - unless & until the West engage Economy Engineering & develop stable economy systems & controls.

But that is not possible if corporates & institutions can blatantly evade Governance and as a consequence maintain corporate Organised Crime which collectively produces Economy Terrorism.

All this is why it is imperative that Governance violations are addressed promptly BEFORE minor property & other damage increase to major damage.

A Governance violation is a small claim issue; the fact that enforced compliance of a micro event brings macro benefits does not increase any one claim beyond it being small.

Ire= land is signatory to the Rome Statute & Universal Declaration of Human Rights; it follows that the UDHR is Supreme Law and that Ireland's Constitution & Law are SUBORDINATE to the UDHR.

Pro= perty under UDHR is all-inclusive: fixed, moveable, tangible, intangible.

In terms of Small Claims, 'damage to property' includes 'property' as fully envisaged under the Constitution & Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) - it would be an Article 30 violation of UDHR were this full interpretation of 'property' not upheld - these are both fixed & moveable, both tangible & intangible, and claims for property damage include, are measured by, time-wastage costs in (self) rectification of property damage.

In short: Governance violations, although small issues in any one case, collectively in the aggregate have massive DESTRUCTIVE macro-impacts - Consequently enforced compliance, via a small claim, can also collectively have massive CONSTRUCTIVE macro-impacts.

= G8 are currently (June 18) meeting in Ireland to find ways to solve the global economy problems - the Justice system needs, willingly, to be part of the solution.

= Background

The RIA was intended to be & should be an academy for excellence in the pursuit of the sciences & humanities and formed under Royal Charter by King George III on January 28, 1786, BUT abusive actions by RIA President & Council have grossly undermined this; subsequent to various of my Intellectual Property inputs the RIA recently (2013) transformed its juristic persona characteristics through the adoption of a Customer Charter. It is pointed out that the Intellectual Property of mine, consumed by the RIA, was not paid for by the RIA -> a governance violation by RIA.

The RIA's very existence has largely been possible due to support from state funds, the state having been in various forms in Ireland's history; nevertheless RIA funding has derived from State funds essentially derived from taxpayers' monies (or from private monies defrauded by corporate Organised Crime, concrete proofs available)

In short a Contract has existed since inception of the RIA, between the RIA & the public in its various & numerous forms from the singular natural persona to juristic collective bodies, and the new Customer Charter confirms such contract (charter & contract being synonymous terms)

The same applies to all Royal Chartered & similar institutions globally.

Roy= al Society Paul Nurse (the Speaker at the discourse referred to herein) is also hostile toward me not only for my having disproved Newton's Opticks but also for my demonstrating that the RS's history is steeped in dishonesty stemming from Newton.

Sin= ce beginning to attend various functions such as discourses, seminars, conferences at the RIA I had noticed much lack of Governance. My raising of objections created animosity, but nevertheless transforms occurred, the new Customer Charter being one transform.

Nev= ertheless animosity from RIA has strongly remained such that at events the various chairpersons have clearly been instructed to ignore my raised-hand during question time.

I h= ave also raised strong objection regarding the ex RIA president Nicholas Canny publicly insulting Ireland's bus drivers with his self-superior statements, no apology was forthcoming from RIA to the bus drivers nor to myself for the attack against me for objecting.

Muc= h hostility by RIA has remained - on one occasion a Member physically assaulted & orally insulted me whilst I objected to a governance violation by RIA.

Amo= ngst my Professional Engineering work I have created clearer understandings of why economies, locally & globally, go boom/bust, have pioneered Economy Engineering; but have also pursued research & development into physics. This research led to the realisation that Newton's Opticks were wrong; and consequently Edwin Hubble's 'expanding universe' & Albert Einstein's energy & relativity theories were wrong. My R&D further showed, beyond any reasonable doubt, that Newton had stolen the Intellectual Property behind the Opticks works.

My R&D has also realised incorrect interpretations of weather & climate, which is why forecasting is not so effective.

It = is now over 2 years since my revelations concerning Newton's Opticks errors and I have repeatedly requested from the RIA an Open Meeting to present these findings, as the Royal/Customer Charter provides - this request has been hostilely denied. Children, right now, are wrongly being educated with defective science. However the President Luke Drury (LD) eventually agreed to a private meeting on May 9 last. Being a private meeting I was restrained from reporting fully on the events but was able to report points of fact - which I did the following day. However, the circumstances which were causal of this claim now releases me from such restraint.

It = is important to recognise that LD is a theoretical (not an experimental) astro-physicist and that my R&D into Newton's opticks has essentially proved much of LD's life's work to be incorrect, as with Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins and with the IPCC & Mary Robinson in relation to climate change, and with science academia in general. My R&D has completely transformed the generally long-held view of how the Universe & World functions in its (near) most fundamental manner.

It = is understandable, as I full well know as an engineer, the gut wrench when one discovers that one has been wrong in any particular project/task - but professionalism compels acceptance & meticulous correction of the error; and not to sweep it out of sight.

The same cannot be said of scientists who do not operate under statutory regulated professional body as such (or as to the best of my knowledge)

As = a consequence of my R&D disproving Newton, LD has become increasingly hostile; during the private meeting it took much of the time cajoling him into actually observing through a prism to which he repeatedly fell back to repeating incorrect theories; but it was when the sun came out briefly, even though weakly, that I could demonstrate with sunlight that Newton WAS wrong - at that point of realisation LD became extremely agitated & angry and kept insisting I leave the academy house, which I did whilst trying to reason with him en route to the exit. RIA security cameras can verify this.

The hostility from LD has not diminished despite my numerous attempts to keep matters on a constructive path; the RIA Council also do not respond to my communications as is required of them - this is in direct breach of the Royal Charter & new Customer Charter.

I a= lso point out that academia in general is held subservient to the governance violations/abuses by the RIA. R&D grants are won or lost based upon academics toeing the RIA's 'line'. Oppose, and grants are cut-off/not awarded. This is a gross abuse & explains why academics produce 'science' works that conform to the needs of corporates, which becomes Organised Crime, and explains why science has gone far-off track into science fiction, both physics & especially economics.

Cor= porate Organised Crime, and hence oppressive & destructive Economy Terrorism, occurs partly because Grants are not being correctly distributed on Merit grounds.

A particular RIA event occurred in a Trinity College auditorium a few year ago - a Nobel Prize scientist was lecturing with an Irish Times reporter acting as Chair - I raised objections to the reporter, being an unqualified person, acting as Chair of a science lecture - the reporter made many incorrect science statements - yet, not one of the numerous senior science academics in attendance dared to challenge RIA's gross Governance violation - because of fear of reprisals.

The public are largely misinformed by 'science' reporters, who are unqualified, who in turn are being misinformed by unregulated 'scientists', and who hostilely refuse to accept that Newton's opticks are wrong.

BBC regularly present 'science' programmes presented by unqualified, unregulated persons. Of note is a recent series presented by Marcus du Sautoy, whom I keep regularly informed of my R&D. On Monday June 24 BBC4 aired a new 2013 programme: Precision: The Measure of all Things. Du Sautoy falsely presented disproved 'science' pertaining to Newton's Opticks - including omitting evidence on a sketch diagram that proved ownership of IP to another unknown person. Later in the programme he presented personnel from UK's National Physical Laboratory who reinforced incorrect interpretations of light stemming from errors in opticks stemming from Newton's dishonesty.

The evidence of opticks errors have been presented to RIA President Luke Drury but he is in hostile denial, and he & RIA Council, and other academic institutions, refuse an Open Meeting to air the proofs of my R&D that disproves 350 years of incorrect opticks.

The= re are many other important points to consider, some of which are:

- t= hat the majority of RIA members are academics funded by taxpayers' money - this means our money is being used by RIA to entrench Organised Crime which works against us, hence economic turmoil.

- ex-President Mary Robinson's Climate Justice is supported by Richard Branson a corporate criminal that has built his business through defrauded employee pensions & other scams. (Note: I have for long & regularly kept Branson informed of these facts, he has chosen not to challenge me, because these statements are true & proofs are available - Branson has accepted these truths, hence no one else can claim the statements are abusive or defamatory. The fact that Justice/Police do not investigate & prosecute Branson is proof of breakdown in Justice system)

- t= he RIA's Customer Charter was unilaterally imposed upon the people, the Public had no inputs into its establishment - which is a governance violation. Consequently any interpretation of the Charter must be such that the Customer receives full benefit of any doubt as to interpretations, or of any Rights violations.

- t= he fact that RIA are actively assisting corporates with defective academic models, which is the means by which Organised Crime is legitimised, and that Justices are members of the RIA, is what causes the Justice System to be undermined.

- R= IA fail to display Minutes of General & other Meetings on their website, and the contents of minutes are totally inadequate & with relevant issues purposefully omitted.

- Conferences, seminars, discourses from RIA are essentially 'one-way' communications; any attempt to counter defective points is cut-short & interaction limited to questions, which wrongly assumes that what went before justifies a question rather than, and often, a rebuttal.

At = one General Meeting I raised a 'point-of-order' concerning some of the above points but was immediately abusively shouted down by LD & with one or two hecklers in support. This confirms that the RIA has no intention of fulfilling its Customer/Royal Charter obligations of engaging with the public, or of transparently keeping the public correctly informed, or of achieving excellence in the sciences & humanities. The purpose of these obstructions to valid objections being simply to maintain defective science giving false credibility to corporate Organised Crime.

And how better to do it, than having Justices on board!

Ano= ther crucial factor behind RIA's Governance violations is the failure of the Comptroller & Auditor General fulfilling its duties in auditing the RIA.

[Fr= om Comptroller & Auditor General website:

'Mission

To provide independen= t assurance that public money is properly managed and spent to good effect and to contribute to improvements in public administration

The role of the Offic= e is to

  • audit and report on the accounts of public bodies

  • establish that transactions of public bodies are in accordance with the legal authorities governing them and that funds are applied for the purposes intended

  • provide assurance on the system of internal financial control put in place by each body

  • examine whether each body administers its resources economically and efficiently and has mechanisms in place to evaluate the effectiveness of operations

  • authorise the release of funds from the Exchequer for purposes permitted by law

In implementing this mandate account is taken of the special considerations which attach to the management of public funds including the requirements of probity and sound corporate governance']


The C&AG does not audit the award of funds for research & development, or of RIA's general operations. The term 'probity' does not feature in the functioning of the RIA because C&AG does not compel such compliance - 'probity' is that all encompassing term that closes any & all loopholes for those intent on governance violations.

It is because probity is absent that RIA can shout down legitimate opposition & objections, call on police & Justices to maintain governance violations -> and hence R&D is grossly skewed to maintaining corporate Organised Crime.


Governments are strongly influenced by academic 'science' models, with much influence from RIA, which impact on government policies & law, which then skew economies detrimentally, resulting in protests. Governments can simply claim they are following 'Best Advice/Practice', yet government/s know that RIA, hence academia, do not comply with Governance, which is why RIA can produce defective 'science' models.


This Court should not attribute any significance to the fact that two Justices, including Chief Justice, are members of the RIA. Outside of their Offices they are no different to any other persons, entitled to no especial privileges other than allowed for through legitimate remunerations & protections, are bound by court orders, including those from this Small Claim Court. Therefore this Court must not be swayed into thinking that some members of RIA being Justices gives credibility to the RIA. The numerous governance violations confirms RIA's lack of credibility.

The RIA have for long been in gross violation of even the most basic of Governance Principles - hence RIA do NOT purse Excellence.

The RIA's position over my R&D that disproves Newton's Opticks is not dissimilar to flat-earth thinkers oppressively opposing (then, centuries ago) new science that showed the world round.

Whe= ther the Court agrees or disagrees with my R&D results is IMMATERIAL to the fact that the RIA has CONTRACTUALLY failed to address the issues in an appropriate forum, and allowing me to interact with Academic Freedom - this contractual failure by RIA is the cause of the claim herein.

The contractual failure is also the governance failure.

(I also point out that Ireland's communications infrastructure is compromised by USA & UK invasion - the recent revelations in the media concerning Edward Snowden's release of information concerning USA & UK spying, is also affecting Ireland. Both UPC.ie & Eircom.ie are unlawfully destroying/blocking state communications.

Bot= h UPC & Eircom are owned & controlled by USA ISPs that are destroying and/or spying on sovereign state & other legitimate communications & websites. Due to my R&D Eircom have recently changed their corporate structure - Eircom have consumed my IP without payment.

Gar= da (Police) Commissioner refuses to uphold the law and hence refuses to act - in fact he now blocks my email address; the Chief Justice refuses to uphold the Constitution and hence refuses to act)

= RIA's Customer Charter

(appended below)

NOTES:

- The term 'general public' means the private persons individually aggregated into the collective 'public'

- t= he term 'use' means to 'consume'

Con= sequently the intended purpose of the RIA's Charter is a contract which meets the requirements for a Small Claim, vis: 'a claim in respect of goods or services bought for private use from someone selling them in the course of a business (consumer claim)'

Gov= ernance failures/abuses by RIA incur property damage.

- R= IA wrongly mixes stakeholders with customers

- R= IA wrongly gives its Academy members priority over the general public

- R= IA opposes achievements in learning by denying Newton was wrong

= Particulars of Claim


On Friday June 14, 2013 the RIA held a long advertised (more than 12 months) Discourse by Royal Society President Paul Nurse (see email attached below). By error I had made two bookings on different dates hence had reserved 2 seats.


On arrival at the RIA Academy House I was confronted by staff with a names list, it transpired that my name was not on the list despite having made 2 bookings.

It quickly became clear that the RIA had purposefully changed the title of the discourse & hence now stated that the tickets I held were for a cancelled event & that the current evening's event was entirely different. I pointed out that no notice of cancellation had been sent out, that the current event was the same venue as the booked event, on the same date, at the same time, by the same person - and that the ONLY difference was the title of the discourse, which change of title has occurred in other discourses before at the RIA but without rebooking necessary.

(Old Title: Great Ideas of Biology; New Title: Making Science Work)

Another female member stated that I could not go in because of Health & Safety reasons - the mind boggles that Ireland can be held enslaved to such feeble arguments; 'health & safety' is often used as the first line of opposition so as to not do anything.


I had to side-step Pauric Dempsey (PD, who has previously without any cause physically assaulted & orally insulted me) to speak to Luke Drury - it quickly became clear that LD's unwarranted anger, over my R&D having destroyed long-held science theories & much of LD's science works, was still seething within LD. LD stated that I was abusive to the Academy in having insulted the Chief Justice Susan Denham. I pointed out that I was simply making a valid/lawful (political) statement (that the Chief Justice had undermined the Judiciary & its Impartiality by accepting membership of the RIA which did not uphold Honesty), and politely so.

On the grounds LD had stated, he demanded that I leave the Academy - it was clear then that this was the true & only reason behind the devious concoction of changing the name of the discourse - so as to deny me access, to deny Academic Freedom, and by devious manipulations.

(This is not dissimilar to a patient thumping a doctor for breaking bad news to the patient)


I pointed out again that I had made a booking (x2) & showed him the print out of the email (below), that no notice of cancellation of the other discourses had been sent out. LD restated PD's statement that it was a different event.

I reiterated that no notice of cancellation had been sent out, that the current event was the same venue as the booked event, on the same date, at the same time, by the same person - and that the ONLY difference was the title of the discourse, which change of title has occurred in other discourses before at the RIA but without rebooking necessary.



It was clear LD's bravado had increased a number of clicks now that he had bought on board Chief Justice Susan Denham as a member of the RIA, to join another member, Supreme Court Justice, Adrian Hardiman.


LD demanded I leave; I stated again that I had a valid booking & that there were always plenty of seats available (by 18h00 start there were still plenty available) - LD stated that he would call the police (garda); I said that was fine, this because we needed to establish the extent to which the RIA can & will abusively call upon State Authority to entrench the RIA's dishonesty & undermine Academic Freedom.


(It is interesting to note that on Monday June 10, 4 days prior, the RIA held a Seminar: Values in University Education: From Academic Freedom to Impact; David Puttnam (UK, House of Lords & Open University Chancellor) also presented by weblink.

In the seminar it was pointed out that London School of Economics had recently pulled one of their conferences in the middle-east (Bahrain?) because of government interference with speakers (but now RIA was prepared to destroy Academic Freedom)

I raised to Puttnam that the RIA was in hostile denial over my having disproved Newton's Opticks - of which Puttnam is fully aware as I keep him & Parliament informed of my Professional Engineering R&D; Puttnam went off on a tangent about Ove Arup engineers and purposefully avoided/evaded addressing the issue)


After some 15 minutes 2 police constables arrived (B480 John Starkey & B471 Kenneth? Clince). I pointed out the issues but the police were not prepared to protect against UDHR & Constitutional abuses by the RIA - and, despite my warning that they were abusing their powers and corrupting Academic Freedom (or to effect), the police warned that if I did not leave then I was trespassing - it was clear the police were prepared not to uphold Rights.

I restated that there were plenty seats available and insisted that they view the evidence for themselves - they refused to verify the evidence. I took their names & left


Shortly after, outside, constable JS took my details in his notebook, more a scrap-book. From what I had learnt on a South African Police Reserve training programme years ago -> notebooks had to be meticulously filled-in, no gaps betweens entries, entries lined-off, no missing pages, etc. JS's scrap-book falls far short of professionalism.

BUT, this is not to blame JS, but to blame the generally corrupt nature of Ireland's Police executive, as often stated by the media, headed by Commissioner Martin Callinan & Judiciary headed by Denham, who both continue undermining, as did their predecessors, according to media reports. This is not dissimilar to the status in UK, USA, SA & around the world. NOTE:- global corporate Organised Crime could not be entrenched even if only one Justice System stood up to global corporate crooks.


It is stressed that both JS & KC were polite, but both refused to uphold Rights.


It is beyond all comprehension that Luke Drury & Paul Nurse could corrupt themselves to undermine Academic Freedom and to call upon State Authority to act as thugs; and beyond comprehension that Susan Denham & Adrian Hardiman can undermine themselves and the Judiciary & Justice System by joining a generally dishonest, immoral Academy.


My R&D as a Professional Engineer has been, partly, to establish the Causal Links that have created an unstable Global Economy; to identify principally the dynamics and, consequently, the key personas, natural & juristic, that are scheming the scams that collectively make up global corporate Organised Crime.

It is this collective corporate Organised Crime that imposes Economy Terrorism upon the World; which drives impoverishment, enslavement (including forcing women into sexual prostitution) & is causal of socio-economic upheaval that erupts into civil war - as we see in the middle-east.

Peace initiatives cannot be sustained because the underlying economic models are the very cause of destabilisation.


The professional/academic dereliction, governance violations, by Luke Drury, Paul Nurse, Susan Denham, Adrian Hardiman, are part contributory to global Organised Crime.


RIA have failed to fulfil its Royal Charter; its Customer charter; its Mission Statement, Customer Service Statement, General Customer Care statement & its Complaints procedures - all of which falls under the general term of Governance.



The nature of this claim is:- to compel Governance compliance by RIA, a small-claim is a simple means for attaining enforced compliance, for compensation for wastage/loss/damage of Intellectual Property reflected in the time-damage/loss of same,

and all due to RIA's Governance & Contractual violations through its abusive actions.






= Claim:

  1. To direct the RIA to contractually comply with its Customer Charter/Royal Charter and fully comply with all reasonable Governance requirements

  2. To direct the RIA to contractually comply with its Customer Charter/Royal Charter and to promptly hold an Open Meeting to hear & consider my evidence concerning Newton's Opticks errors.

  3. To direct the RIA to contractually comply with its Customer Charter/Royal Charter and to cease & desist from any further attacks, insults or unwarranted obstructions against me

  4. To direct the RIA to pay wasted time-costs due to access denial to June 14 Discourse of (6 hours x E324.00) + E25.00 =3D E1969.00 (One Thousand Nine Hundred & Sixty Nine Euros)

    1. (2 hours preparation, 1.5 hours travel, 2.5 hours of lost work-time due to distractions of RIA abuses =3D 6 hours)

    2. Reiterate: this is not a penalty but simply a correct (part) award of a Research Grant that should have been awarded by RIA had Merit been correctly applied to adjudication of my R&D.

    3. Based upon Engineers Ireland generally accepted professional/chartered engineer rates of 18c/hour per E100 of gross annual salary of a mid-career Chartered/Professional Engineer at E60,000 Gross =3D E108.00 per hour (One Hundred & Eight Euros per hour)

    4. BUT, I point out that I am a senior Professional Engineer in qualifications & experience, that my professional R&D is at the forefront of pioneering new sciences (Physics & Economics) that disproves centuries-long-standing theories & progresses science into new correct directions; therefore I contend that the hourly rate of E108.00 does not reflect the seniority or standard of my work-time; and that a factor of 3 would be more appropriate even though still not reflecting the true higher value of my work-time =3D> E324.00 peer hour. I point out that the value of my R&D to Ireland alone far exceeds 100 Billion Euros, globally the value runs into the Trillions - I can provide evidence of my professional work to prove my claims)

    5. Due to the fact that governments have not paid me for my R&D AND because corporates are openly hostile to me, I have not been properly paid for some ten years, consequently I am unable to afford the fee for this application & request condonation for same.





Sincerely

Chr= is Addington Pr.Eng.

cdadd2@= gmail.com, cda= dd3@eircom.net,

+353 (0)86 168 4318



---= ----- Original Message --------

Subject:

Royal Irish Academy Event

Date:

22 Jan 2013 14:48:00 +0000

From:

no-reply@ria.ie

To:

cdadd



Event: Academy Discourse: Great Ideas of Biology
Date of Registration: Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Venue: Belfast/Dublin - Venue TBC
Date: 13th/14th June 2013, 6 pm


Thank you for registering for Academy Discourse: Great Ideas of Biology, you have booked 2 tickets. Please print this email to use as your ticket.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All queries should be sent to e= vents@ria.ie

RIA website:

Academy Discourse: Making Science Work

Sir Paul Nurse, will give a discourse on Making Science Work at The Great Hall, Queen's University Belfast and Academy House, Dublin on 13 and 14 June. More Details.



= ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY

= CUSTOMER CHARTER

= Mission Statement

The Royal Irish Academy (RIA), the academy for the sciences and humanities for the

who= le of Ireland, will vigorously promote excellence in scholarship, recognise

ach= ievements in learning, and undertake its own research project, particularly in

are= as relating to Ireland and its heritage. It will reflect upon, advise on and contribute

to public debate and public policy formation on issues of major interest in science,

tec= hnology and culture. It will continue to offer an independent forum to Irish

sch= olars, it will provide a network of support for scholarly disciplines through its

net= work of academic committees and commissions, it will maintain and enhance its

uni= que library, it will publish scholarly papers and it will represent the world of Irish

lea= rning internationally.

= Customer Service Statement

The Academy is fully committed to the pursuit of excellence in all aspects of its

ser= vice to its stakeholders and customers, both external and internal. We will seek to

ens= ure that this commitment is met at all times by using our resources in an efficient

and effective way.

Our stakeholders/customers consist of the Academy=92s Members, the wider academic

com= munity, members of our specialist academic committees, users of our Library,

the general public, the Higher Education Authority, relevant government

dep= artments, and, internally, the Academy=92s staff.

= General Customer Care

The Academy is committed to providing its services in a professional, considerate,

cou= rteous and open manner. We will be sensitive to our customers=92 particular needs

and circumstances and respect their rights under equality and other legislation.

The Academy is committed to delivering a high-level quality service.

The Academy is committed to providing equality of treatment The Academy is

com= mitted to the principles of modernisation and flexibility in its work practices. It will

tak= e all necessary steps available to it to achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness

in = the provision of its services.

Sta= ff members will respond to communications, whether by letter, email, phone-call

or fax, promptly and courteously. Every effort will be made to provide substantive

res= ponses within a reasonable timeframe to queries from stakeholders and

cus= tomers.

We will continue to expand and develop our web site and to maximise the electronic

ava= ilability of information, and publications.

We = are committed to the use of up-to-date modern technology so that our services

con= tinue to maintain a high technical standard.

We will continue to take steps towards full implementation of the relevant provisions

of = the Official Languages Act 2003.

We will endeavour to develop and maintain good internal communications so that

the= re is an integrated approach to serving our customers/stakeholders in a prompt

and responsive way.

We will continue to ensure that all Academy publications are of the highest quality in

con= tent, style and presentation.

Aca= demy House, 19 Dawson Street, Dublin 2, is the main centre of the Academy=92s

act= ivities, hosting many conferences, symposia etc. The Academy=92s Library, with its

hig= hly significant manuscript collection, is located there also. Physical access to

Aca= demy House for persons with impaired mobility is limited because of the physical

str= ucture of the 18th century building. A ramp and invalid chair have been installed in

Aca= demy House in recent years, so facilitating persons with physical disability to

ent= er both the lower ground and ground floors of Academy House. In effect, this

mea= ns that such persons can attend functions in the Academy=92s public rooms and

use the Academy=92s Library facilities.

= Complaints

If = a person is dissatisfied with the standard of service received, she/he may contact

the relevant head of the section concerned who will investigate the matter. The

out= come of the investigation will be reviewed by the Executive Secretary who will

iss= ue a written response to the person who made the complaint. All such reviews will

tak= e cognisance of existing laws, rules, practice or policy of the Academy or the

gen= erally accepted principles of equity and good administrative practice.

= How to contact the Academy:

The Royal Irish Academy

19 Dawson Street

Dub= lin 2.

Tel= ephone: 01 6762570

Fax= : 01 6762346

Ema= il: inf= o@ria.ie

Web site:

www.= ria.ie

--=20
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
--------------090406070409090209000607--